互联网领域反垄断执法和解制度研究

发布时间：2018-04-01 11:36

本文选题：和解制度　切入点：执法　出处：《新疆财经大学》2015年硕士论文

【摘要】：互联网这一新兴领域,新的平台,发展之迅速令人不可思议。现今,互联网无处不在。由于互联网能给人们提供大量的信息,创造巨大的交易平台,地理因素已经不再是经济发展的阻碍,在互联网中,技术不断创新,新的经济模式慢慢形成,商业活动多元化,各种交易变得快捷,人们的市场意识也被改变。资本的雄厚积累和技术的日新月异使得互联网行业从一般的自由竞争迈向垄断,互联网领域已经形成了垄断格局。一些垄断企业凭借自身在互联网行业中无人能撼动的强大地位,进行做出垄断协议、胡乱使用市场支配地位、非正常的经营者集中等多数垄断行为,使得我国本来自由、有序的互联网市场秩序遭到破坏。比起具体的传统行业,互联网领域是抽象的。我国出台反垄断法时间较晚,尽管其对市场经济的有效运行、公平竞争秩序的维护、垄断行为的规制、对消费者以及公共利益的保护,保证社会主义市场经济正常有序的发展方面起到了相当重要的作用。但是,互联网领域的垄断是一个新话题,有别于传统行业,传统的反垄断执法方式会出现不适用的现象。而且,互联网领域的垄断行为本身界定就比较困难,具有复杂性和模糊性,案件越复杂,执法成本就越高。对于互联网领域中涉嫌的垄断行为,我国的《反垄断法》并没有确凿的法律规制。第一,《反垄断法》第四十五条对反垄断执法和解制度描绘了一个基本轮廓,概括性地规定的相关制度,但对在互联网中的垄断行为没有做明确的规定。第二,国家工商总局在对适用反垄断执法和解制度时达成的垄断协议、肆意乱用市场支配地位的相关规定是对《反垄断法》第四十五条的详细解说,也没有涉及到互联网领域。第三,发改委对适用反垄断执法和解制度企业在价格上达成垄断协议的规定也是建立在《反垄断法》第四十五条的基础上。工商总局与发改委对反垄断执法和解制度的具体解释也存在差异,这属于立法方面的缺陷。因此,在具体实践中,互联网这一特殊的领域中的垄断案件,就给了执法机构过大的自由裁量权,这样不利于公平公正。因此,反垄断执法和解制度成为了一种新兴的纠纷解决机制。作为一种非正式程序,反垄断执法和解制度有着高效率、低成本、温和性的优越性,使得相关企业在诉诸执法机构之外又多了一条解决纠纷的捷径。也就是说,构建互联网领域反垄断执法和解制度对于我国互联网市场的自由竞争和健康发展有着非常重要的意义。本文从以下几个部分阐述与互联网领域有关的反垄断执法过程中的和解制度。第一章,着重阐述文章的产生背景、相关意义、国内外学者的不同研究、研究问题的方法。第二章,解析互联网领域反垄断执法和解制度,阐述其性质,剖析互联网领域反垄断执法和解制度的重要性,初步探讨互联网领域在反垄断执法过程中的和解制度的内涵和要求,解析在互联网领域实施反垄断执法过程中的和解制度的必要性。第三章,解读我国互联网领域反垄断执法过程中的和解制度的立法实况,我国《反垄断法》第五十条、第四十五条以法律形式明确规定,发改委和工商总局也相继出台相关规定以处理相关纠纷。通过介绍我国互联网领域反垄断执法过程中的和解制度的立法实况,提出不可避免的问题,以期得到解决途径。第四章,确定我国反垄断执法和解制度的整体目标,强调公正与效益的统一,维护竞争与保护公共利益的统一,实现权力约束与权利保障的统一。对照美国、欧盟、我国台湾地区相关立法,结合我国的实际情况,提出适合我国的有效建议。重点解析我国互联网领域反垄断执法过程中的和解制度的对策,从对适合于互联网领域的范围和条件的和解制度,监督制度、惩罚制度和救济制度等方面做出详尽的的分析,希望为实际操作做出一些可以依靠的基础。
[Abstract]:The emerging field of Internet, a new platform, the rapid development of the Internet is unbelievable. Nowadays, everywhere. Because the Internet can provide a lot of information, to create a huge trading platform, geographical factors is no longer hinder economic development, on the Internet, technology innovation, new economic mode gradually formed, commercial activities all transactions become diversified, fast, people's awareness of the market has also been changed. The abundant accumulation of capital and technology change rapidly makes the Internet from free competition to monopoly in general, the Internet industry has formed a monopoly monopoly. Some enterprises with their own strong position in the Internet industry no one can shake, to make a monopoly agreement a dominant market position, the concentration of most of the non normal operators of monopolistic behavior, makes our country was free, orderly and mutual Networking market order is destroyed. Specific than traditional industries, the Internet is abstract. China's anti-monopoly law of late, although the effective operation of the market economy, maintaining the order of fair competition, monopoly, to the consumers and the protection of public interests, ensure the development of the socialist market economy orderly has played an important role. However, the field of Internet monopoly is a new topic, which is different from the traditional industries, the traditional way of anti-monopoly law enforcement will be not applicable. Moreover, monopolistic behavior in the field of the Internet itself is difficult to define, with complexity and fuzziness, the case is more complex, the cost of law enforcement the higher for alleged monopolistic behavior in the field of the Internet, China's "anti-monopoly law > and there is no legal regulation conclusive. First," anti monopoly Law > forty-fifth on antitrust Break execution reconciliation system represents a basic outline of related system of general provisions, but did not make clear provisions on the monopolistic behavior in the Internet. In second, the monopoly agreement the State Administration for Industry and Commerce in the anti-monopoly law enforcement reconciliation system applicable to the relevant provisions of wanton use of market dominant position is on "with interpretation of antitrust law > forty-fifth, are not related to the field of the Internet. Third, development and Reform Commission on the application of anti-monopoly law enforcement reconciliation system of enterprise monopoly agreement in price is established on the basis of" anti monopoly Law > forty-fifth. There are differences in the Administration for Industry and commerce with the NDRC specific interpretation of the anti-monopoly law enforcement reconciliation system, which belongs to the defects of the legislation. Therefore, in practice, which is a special case of Internet monopoly in the field of law enforcement agencies, gave too much discretion by self Right, this is not conducive to fairness. Therefore, the anti-monopoly law enforcement reconciliation system has become a new kind of dispute resolution mechanism. As a kind of informal procedures, the anti-monopoly law enforcement reconciliation system with high efficiency, low cost, mild superiority, the relevant enterprises in resorting to law enforcement agencies besides a solution dispute shortcut. That is to say, the field of Internet construction of the anti-monopoly law enforcement reconciliation system has a very important significance for China's Internet market free competition and healthy development. In this paper, the reconciliation system and the Internet in the field of anti-monopoly law enforcement in the process from the following parts. The first chapter focuses on the background, the the significance of research, different scholars at home and abroad, the research method. In the second chapter, the anti-monopoly law enforcement reconciliation system of the Internet field, expounds the nature of Internet domain analysis The importance of anti-monopoly law enforcement reconciliation system, preliminary discussion of connotation and requirements in the anti-monopoly law enforcement reconciliation system in the field of Internet, analysis the necessity of implementation of the reconciliation system in the process of enforcement of the anti monopoly in the field of Internet. In the third chapter, the legislative interpretation on reconciliation system in the process of enforcement of the anti monopoly in the field of Internet in China, I in the "anti monopoly Law > fiftieth, forty-fifth in the form of law clearly stipulates that the NDRC and SAIC has issued relevant regulations to deal with the disputes. Through the introduction of reconciliation system of our country legislation live Internet antitrust enforcement process, put forward the inevitable question, in order to get the solution. The fourth chapter to determine the overall objectives of the anti-monopoly law enforcement reconciliation system in our country, the unity of justice and efficiency, maintaining the unity of competition and the protection of public interests, realize the power restriction With the protection of the rights of the United States. The unified control, the European Union, the relevant legislation of China's Taiwan region, combined with China's actual situation, put forward effective suggestions for China's countermeasures. Law enforcement reconciliation system in the process of anti monopoly in China focuses on the field of the Internet, from the reconciliation system of scope and conditions suitable for the field of the Internet. The supervision system, punishment system and relief system to make detailed analysis, hope to make some foundation can rely on for the actual operation.

【学位授予单位】：新疆财经大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：D922.294

【相似文献】