我国反垄断行政罚款制度研究

发布时间：2018-04-02 05:16

本文选题：反垄断法　切入点：垄断违法行为　出处：《北京交通大学》2015年硕士论文

【摘要】：反垄断行政执法机关对违法者处以行政罚款,是反垄断法所采取的最重要、也是最常用的的法律手段,具有惩罚违法行为和预防和减少违法行为的功能。和相对比较严苛的的刑事制裁以及损害赔偿功能及实施范围有限的民事救济相比,行政罚款制度因其自身的特点具有一定的优势,可以弥补之前二者存在的不足,充分发挥反垄断法的制裁功能。因此,行政罚款制度在各国反垄断法的立法和执法实践中都发挥着关键的作用,。作为一种重要的反垄断制裁手段,行政罚款制度在世界各主要国家的反垄断法中都有所规定,并且各国都在不断提高罚款数额以加大处罚力度,增强反垄断法的威慑性。以至于可以使用“罚款中心主义”来称呼行政罚款的这种地位。笔者以我国反垄断行政罚款制度作为研究对象,全文包括引言、正文、结论三部分。正文共计三部分。第一部分笔者对我国反垄断行政罚款制度进行了概述,首先对反垄断行政罚款制度的概念、特征和功能进行了简要分析,然后对我国反垄断行政罚款制度的执行主体、规制的行为、罚款数额的设定形式及标准以及配套的宽免制度进行了概述。第二部分通过分析我国反垄断行政罚款制度及其相关规定,从统一罚款细则的缺失、多头执法导致执法标准与效果出现差异、相关规定的概念模糊加大执法难度、罚款数额较低导致威慑性不足以及配套的宽免制度不够完善五个方面分析了我国反垄断行政罚款制度存在的不足。第三部分通过借鉴欧盟竞争法在行政罚款制度方面的相关经验,并结合我国的实际情况,对我国反垄断行政罚款制度存在的问题提出相应的完善建议。分别从制定统一具体的罚款指南、强化反垄断执法权限、明确相关概念、提高罚款数额以及完善配套宽免制度五个方面提出了自己的构想,以此增强行政罚款执法的透明性、威慑性,可操作性,以期我国反垄断法能得到更好地实施,并有效地发挥威慑作用,遏制违法垄断行为的发生。
[Abstract]:Anti-monopoly administrative law enforcement agencies impose administrative fines on violators, which is the most important and the most commonly used legal means in anti-monopoly law. It has the function of punishing illegal acts and preventing and reducing illegal acts.Compared with the relatively harsh criminal sanctions and the limited civil remedies of the function of compensation for damages and the limited scope of implementation, the administrative fine system has certain advantages because of its own characteristics, and it can make up for the shortcomings of the previous two systems.We should give full play to the sanction function of the anti-monopoly law.Therefore, the administrative penalty system plays a key role in the legislation and enforcement practice of antimonopoly law in various countries.As an important means of anti-monopoly sanctions, the administrative penalty system is stipulated in the anti-monopoly laws of major countries in the world, and all countries are constantly increasing the amount of fines in order to increase the penalties and enhance the deterrent nature of anti-monopoly laws.So that the use of "penalty centralism" to address the status of administrative fines.The author takes the antitrust administrative fine system as the research object, the full text includes the introduction, the text, the conclusion three parts.The text consists of three parts.In the first part, the author gives an overview of the administrative penalty system of our country. Firstly, it analyzes the concept, characteristics and functions of the system, and then analyzes the main executive body of the system.The behavior of regulation, the setting form and standard of fine amount and the supporting relief system are summarized.The second part through the analysis of our country antitrust administrative penalty system and its related provisions, from the lack of uniform fine rules, multiple law enforcement resulting in different standards and effects of law enforcement, the concept of the relevant provisions to increase the difficulty of law enforcement.The low amount of fines leads to the insufficiency of deterrence and the inadequacy of the supporting system of relief and exemption. The paper analyzes the shortcomings of the administrative penalty system of antitrust in China from five aspects.In the third part, by drawing lessons from the relevant experience of EU competition law in the administrative penalty system and combining the actual situation of our country, the author puts forward corresponding suggestions to improve the existing problems of the antimonopoly administrative penalty system in our country.In order to enhance the transparency of administrative penalty enforcement, the author puts forward his own ideas from five aspects: making uniform and specific fine guidelines, strengthening the authority of anti-monopoly law enforcement, clarifying related concepts, increasing the amount of fines and perfecting the supporting relief system, so as to enhance the transparency of administrative penalty enforcement.Deterrence, maneuverability, in the hope that our anti-monopoly law can be better implemented, and effectively play a deterrent role to curb the occurrence of illegal monopoly behavior.
【学位授予单位】：北京交通大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：D922.294

【相似文献】