对赌协议法律规制的路径再勘

发布时间：2018-04-09 17:22

本文选题：对赌协议　切入点：实践困局　出处：《青海社会科学》2015年01期

【摘要】：随着2012年年底最高院于"海富案"中作出有限肯定对赌协议效力的一纸终审判决,学界、实务界甚嚣尘上经年有余的对赌协议效力之争划上了短暂的句号,但以2013年底湖北省首例"对赌协议和解"案为代表的"后海富时代"对赌协议案例再次开启了各方面对于对赌协议性质、效力等问题不同角度思考。对赌协议在中国的实践状况如何?面临什么问题?在司法、行政监管、市场实践领域应当如何进行立场重设,这是本文旨在解决的问题。本文共分两部分,第一部分探讨对赌协议在中国的实践困局迁衍并简要分析其原因。第二部分探讨从"对赌第一案"到"对赌和解第一案"后我国对赌协议未来规范的路径选择,包括了司法、行政、实务不同视角下对对赌协议的规制方略。综上,提出在新形势下,我国未来对赌协议理性法律规制之路。
[Abstract]:With the final judgment of the Supreme Court in the "Haifu case" in the end of 2012, which limited the validity of the gambling agreement, the academic and practical circles have been engaged in more than years of controversy over the validity of the gambling agreement, which has drawn a short end.However, the case of Houhai Fu era, represented by the first case of settlement of gambling agreement in Hubei Province at the end of 2013, has once again opened different perspectives on the nature and effectiveness of the agreement on gambling.What is the practice of gambling agreements in China?What's the problem?This paper aims to solve the problem of how to reset the position in the field of judicature, administrative supervision and market practice.This paper is divided into two parts. The first part discusses the practical difficulties of gambling agreement in China and briefly analyzes the reasons.The second part discusses the path choice of the future regulation of the gambling agreement from the first case of gambling to the first case of settlement of gambling, including judicial, administrative and practical aspects of the regulation of gambling agreement.In summary, the paper puts forward the road of rational regulation of gambling agreement in the future under the new situation.
【作者单位】：中国人民大学法学院;
【基金】：国家社科基金重大项目“国有企业改革与国有资产保护法律问题研究”(项目号13AFX019) 教育部人文社科青年项目“私募股权基金法律问题研究”(项目号09YJC820113)
【分类号】：D922.291.91

【参考文献】