法律运作中的权利话语——中国网约车案与美国的Uber案、Airbnb案比较研究

发布时间：2018-04-15 01:16

本文选题：互联网 + 新业态权利　；参考：《法学评论》2017年02期

【摘要】：权利话语不是一套概念系统,而是一套陈述系统。在法律运作中,权利话语应当在提升国家能力基础上,回应经济发展的需要,进行社会实证分析。本文以美国近期发生的Airbnb网络运营商短租遭禁起诉纽约州政府为切入点,并对比研究波斯纳法官判决支持Uber网约车行业一案,以及中国互联网专车第一案。尽管在不同案件中权利话语有差异,但是互联网新业态中的权利话语共性很明显,即自由竞争权利优于监管权力。由于互联网与技术自由、创新能力深度纠缠,互联网新业态模式与一般业态模式下的权利话语必然有所不同。不能根据"关系权利话语"、"政治异化"、"道德考量"来展开权利话语,应当利用"自由权"、"绩效合法性"、"国家能力"展开互联网新业态的权利话语。
[Abstract]:The discourse of right is not a system of concepts, but a system of statement.In the operation of law, the discourse of right should respond to the needs of economic development on the basis of improving national capacity and carry out social empirical analysis.In this paper, the author takes the New York state government as the starting point, which has recently taken place in the United States, to sue the New York state government for short lease of Airbnb network operators, and makes a comparative study of Judge Posner's decision to support the Uber car-hailing industry and the first case of China's Internet private car.Although there are differences in the discourse of right in different cases, the commonness of discourse in the new form of Internet is obvious, that is, the right of free competition is superior to the power of supervision.Due to the freedom of Internet and technology, and the deep entanglement of innovation ability, the discourse of rights in the new mode of Internet is certainly different from that in general mode.The right discourse should not be carried out according to "discourse of relation right", "political alienation" and "moral consideration", but should use "freedom", "legitimacy of performance" and "national capacity" to launch the discourse of rights in the new form of Internet business.
【作者单位】：上海对外经贸大学法学院;
【基金】：国家社科基金一般项目《少数民族乡约的文化创新研究》(课题编号12BMZ039)的资助
【分类号】：D90;D912.29

【相似文献】