德国“事故保险”中因果关系认定标准及其启示

发布时间：2018-04-15 09:11

本文选题：德国 + 一般事故保险　；参考：《东北大学学报(社会科学版)》2017年06期

【摘要】：因果关系的问题一直是法学理论和实践领域重要的问题,德国通过两百多年的时间,在一般事故保险和工伤事故保险中分别确立了自成体系的因果关系认定标准。在一般事故保险中,德国实行"比例化"的因果关系认定标准;在工伤事故保险中,实行"本质条件"说。我国在事故保险中尚没有明确规定因果关系的认定标准,造成了司法实践的混乱局面。效仿德国,应确立有别于我国民法领域的因果关系认定体系,在一般事故保险中实行"比例化"的因果关系认定标准,在工伤事故保险中实行"本质条件"说的认定标准。
[Abstract]:The problem of causality has always been an important problem in the field of legal theory and practice. Through more than 200 years, Germany has established its own standard of causation in general accident insurance and industrial accident insurance respectively.In general accident insurance, Germany carries out the criterion of "proportionality" causality, and in industrial accident insurance, the "essential condition" is applied.There is no definite criterion of causality in accident insurance in our country, which leads to confusion in judicial practice.Following the example of Germany, we should establish the system of causality identification different from that in the field of civil law in our country, implement the criterion of "proportionality" of causality in general accident insurance, and implement the criterion of "essential condition" in industrial accident insurance.
【作者单位】：辽宁大学法学院;中共沈阳市委党校基础教研部;北京语言大学研究生院;
【基金】：中共中央党校全国党校系统重点调研课题资助项目(中校厅发[2017]39号96项)
【分类号】：D951.6;DD912.28

【相似文献】