网络约车平台溢价的包容性监管路径探析

发布时间：2018-04-16 08:20

本文选题：网络约车 + 平台溢价　；参考：《西南交通大学学报(社会科学版)》2017年03期

【摘要】：自网络约车行业产生以来,就存在网络约车平台溢价涉嫌价格违法、价格垄断及侵害消费者合法权益等问题。其原因除网络约车行业存在因互联网的开放性、虚拟性带来的违法行为特别是侵权行为发生后难以追责外,主要还在于传统的监管模式过于单一、僵化,无法与新经济形态下的网络约车行业相适应。包容性监管理念要求明确监管者在监管过程中的角色和定位,以差异化、柔性、适度性为监管标准,这可以完善传统监管模式。因此要解决网络约车平台溢价问题,就要以监管理念、模式的转变为切入点,建立健全网络约车平台溢价的包容性监管体系,引入差异化的溢价标准、发挥社会主体的监督作用及建立指导价法治评估体系等方式,从根本上规范网络约车市场,促进网络约车行业的健康有序发展。
[Abstract]:Since the emergence of the network car-hailing industry, there have been some problems such as price violation, price monopoly and infringement on the legitimate rights and interests of consumers.The main reason is that the traditional regulatory model is too single and rigid, except for the network car-sharing industry, which is characterized by the openness of the Internet and the fact that it is difficult to pursue liability for the illegal acts brought about by the fictitious nature, especially after the infringement acts have taken place.Unable to adapt to the new economic form of the network car-sharing industry.The concept of inclusive supervision requires that the role and orientation of regulators in the process of supervision should be clearly defined, and the standard of regulation should be differentiation, flexibility and moderation, which can perfect the traditional regulatory model.Therefore, in order to solve the problem of premium of network ride-hailing platform, we should take the change of supervision idea and mode as the breakthrough point, establish and improve the inclusive regulatory system of the premium of network-ride-hailing platform, and introduce the standard of differential premium.In order to promote the healthy and orderly development of the network ride-hailing industry, the supervision role of the main body of society and the establishment of the evaluation system of guiding price rule by law are brought into play, so as to standardize the network car-hailing market fundamentally.
【作者单位】：安徽农业大学人文社会科学学院;
【分类号】：D922.296;F572;F724.6

【相似文献】