瑕疵股权转让中的法律问题研究

发布时间：2018-04-18 18:09

本文选题：瑕疵股权转让 + 责任承担　；参考：《深圳大学》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】：瑕疵股权转让是实务(无论是商业交易还是司法实务)中较为常见、爆发频率较高的一类纠纷。虽然我国以司法解释和司法实践的方式对该问题进行了可谓“明确”、“具体”的规定与处理,但是这样的规定与处理并非是处理该类问题的终极且妥当的模式与思路,看似合理的现行规定背后,仍然可以探寻到诸多的不合理甚至是拖沓之处,司法实践当中又通过解释法律或运用法律而体现出了与法律及司法解释可谓不相融合的见解。而且现行规定体现出的过于追求实质性的个案正义,多有牺牲商事交易行为效率追求的表现,实则不利于商业创新与经济发展。对上述问题的回应,是本文的着力点。但是在进行最终的有关瑕疵股权转让责任承担问题的讨论之前,还需要对一些前提性的问题进行一些讨论与回应。即瑕疵股权的内涵与特征,在此部分本人还将对认缴制下未届缴付期限的股权是否属于瑕疵股权这一特定且特殊的问题进行专门的研讨。接下来,在讨论瑕疵股权转让后的责任承担之前,还有必要探讨瑕疵股权转让合同的效力如何,因合同的效力直接决定了最后的责任承担主体与责任范围。在前提性的问题讨论完毕之后,本文就影响瑕疵股权转让后责任承担的因素进行了归纳总结,并逐个进行分析,找出理论与法律规定的关切点,并试图结合实践操作进行合理性的分析,结合对比现行规定的不合理之处,找出完善的角度与空间。文章的最后一部分,系综合上文的论述,在自己的研究结论之下试图提出完善现行瑕疵股权转让后的责任承担机制的观点与构想,希图能够给出较为平衡且合理的关于瑕疵股权转让的处理模式。
[Abstract]:The transfer of defective shares is a kind of dispute which is more common in practice (whether commercial transaction or judicial practice).Although our country has carried on the "clear" and "concrete" stipulation and treatment to this question by the way of judicial interpretation and judicial practice, but such stipulation and treatment is not the ultimate and appropriate mode and train of thought to deal with this kind of problem.Behind the seemingly reasonable current provisions, we can still explore many unreasonable or even procrastination, judicial practice through the interpretation of the law or the application of the law to reflect the law and judicial interpretation can not be said to be integrated with the views.Moreover, the current regulations reflect the excessive pursuit of substantive case justice and the performance of the efficiency pursuit of commercial transactions, which is not conducive to commercial innovation and economic development.The response to the above questions is the focus of this paper.However, before the final discussion on the responsibility for the transfer of defective shares, there are still some preliminary issues to be discussed and responded to.That is, the connotation and characteristics of defective equity. In this part, I will also make a special study on the specific and special problem of whether or not the shares in the underpaid period under the subscription system belong to the defective equity.Then, before discussing the liability assumption after the transfer of defective shares, it is also necessary to discuss the effectiveness of the defective equity transfer contract, because the effectiveness of the contract directly determines the subject and scope of the final liability.After the discussion of the prelude, this paper summarizes the factors that affect the liability after the transfer of defective shares, and analyzes them one by one to find out the theoretical and legal concerns.And attempts to combine the practice operation carries on the rationality analysis, unifies the contrast present stipulation unreasonable place, finds out the consummation angle and the space.The last part of the article is a synthesis of the discussion above, under the conclusion of my own research, I try to put forward the viewpoint and conception of perfecting the responsibility bearing mechanism after the transfer of defective shares.Hito can give a more balanced and reasonable deal with the transfer of defective equity.
【学位授予单位】：深圳大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D922.291.91

【相似文献】