商业秘密司法保护中的价值冲突

发布时间：2018-04-25 17:37

本文选题：商业秘密 + 司法审查阶段　；参考：《贵州民族大学》2015年硕士论文

【摘要】：在商业秘密司法保护实践中,尽管在立法方面有明确的规定,但绝大部分的立法规定缺乏现实的司法实践指引,此时就需要发挥司法的积极作用。本文着眼于商业秘密保护的三个司法审查过程,从商业秘密的构成要件审查、侵犯商业秘密行为构成要件审查以及违法行为的责任审查三个方面,通过现实案例分析商业秘密司法保护中所存在的价值冲突。主要采取了以案例判决书的分析为基础挖掘商业秘密司法保护中的价值冲突的研究方法。旨在通过案例分析得出,围绕商业秘密这一客体所形成的主体关系中,法院对于主体各自的不同价值追求进行价值冲突选择和评价,然后通过再现价值冲突的司法平衡的过程,解读法院对裁判标准的适用把握。进而,结合司法审判的优化和商业秘密持有人的利益保护,提出了相关的启示建议。
[Abstract]:In the practice of the judicial protection of trade secrets, although there are clear provisions in the legislation, most of the legislative provisions lack the practical guidance of judicial practice, so it is necessary to play a positive role in the administration of justice at this time. This paper focuses on the three judicial review processes of the protection of trade secrets, from three aspects: the examination of the constitutive elements of trade secrets, the examination of the constitutive elements of violations of trade secrets and the examination of liability for illegal acts. This paper analyzes the value conflicts in the judicial protection of commercial secrets through practical cases. This paper mainly adopts the research method of value conflict in the judicial protection of trade secret based on the analysis of case judgment. The purpose of this paper is to draw a conclusion from the case study that in the subjective relationship formed by the object of trade secret, the court chooses and evaluates the value conflict of the different value pursuit of the subject, and then through the process of reproducing the judicial balance of the value conflict. Interpretation of the Court's application of the standards of judgment grasp. Furthermore, combining with the optimization of judicial trial and the protection of the interests of the holders of trade secrets, this paper puts forward some enlightening suggestions.
【学位授予单位】：贵州民族大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：D912.29

【参考文献】