金融性财产冻结的权益冲突与分配研究
发布时间:2018-04-28 11:50
本文选题:财产冻结 + 法律性质 ; 参考:《中国政法大学学报》2017年03期
【摘要】:当代经济被称为金融经济,它是以流动性和效率性为核心的经济,财产权利中的行为性权利在某种意义上比归属性权利更重要,是保障财产价值增加或损失减少的核心权利。但是,在我国目前财产冻结的法规中,并没有区分金融性财产和消费性财产,将财产的价值性权利与行为性权利一并冻结。虽然在近期的规定中对此有所考虑,但还没有将其作为原理性问题进行统一规定。[1]这不仅侵犯了当事人的财产权益,同时给其带来了潜在的财产损失,甚至出现了导致许多企业破产、引发群体性事件等不良社会效果的现象。因此,在当代社会必须充分认识到财产的行为性权利,在行政机关、监管机关、司法机关和财产权利人之间合理分配冻结权益,以实现社会综合效果的最优化。
[Abstract]:The contemporary economy is called financial economy, which is based on mobility and efficiency. The behavioral right in property right is more important than attribute right in a sense, and it is the core right to guarantee the increase or loss of property value. However, there is no distinction between financial property and consumer property in the current law of property freezing in our country, and the value right of property is frozen together with the right of behavior. Although this has been taken into account in recent provisions, it has not yet been uniformly regulated as a matter of principle. [1] this not only infringes upon the property interests of the parties, but also results in potential property losses, Even led to bankruptcy of many enterprises, leading to mass events and other adverse social effects. Therefore, in the contemporary society, we must fully recognize the behavioral rights of property, distribute the frozen rights and interests between the administrative organs, the supervisory organs, the judicial organs and the owners of property rights reasonably, in order to realize the optimization of the comprehensive effect of the society.
【作者单位】: 中国政法大学;
【基金】:2014年度国家社会科学基金批准重大项目——“开放经济条件下我国虚拟经济安全运行法律保障研究”(项目批准号:14ZDB148)的阶段性研究成果
【分类号】:D922.28
【相似文献】
相关重要报纸文章 前1条
1 本报两会报道组;芮跃华:建议延长证券案件涉案财产冻结期限[N];上海证券报;2013年
,本文编号:1815164
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/jingjifalunwen/1815164.html