海域上的权利群研究
本文选题:海域上权利群 + 海域使用权 ; 参考:《大连海事大学》2016年博士论文
【摘要】:我国现行法采用的是在客体上将海域与蕴藏于海域的自然资源完全分离的立法技术,由此使得我国海域上权利群体系的构建方式具有鲜明的中国特色。文章主要以解释论的视角,在对现行法进行全面梳理的基础上,力图描绘出我国海域上权利群体系的整体脉络,而后在此框架下,对权利群体系中的权利及各权利间的关系进行梳理,最终将研究的结果反馈于修法之建议。论文共分五章:第一章剖析了海域上权利群的基本理论。具体界定了海域上权利群的含义及其存在区域;在整体上比较了海域上的权利与土地上的权利;以海域与蕴藏于海域的自然资源在客体上之分离为思维进路,划分出了海域上权利群体系的两个子体系。第二章探讨了海域上权利群的客体。在对海域的客体地位进行论述的过程中,文章采用了历史分析的方法对海域的历史形态进行了研究;通过法解释学方法站在解释论的立场上讨论了我国海域的客体地位。在对自然资源的客体地位进行研究时,重点分析了三个方面的内容,一是自然资源的独立客体地位;二是自然资源的特定性;三是作为权利客体的自然资源与构成自然资源之个体的区别。第三章解析了以海域为客体的子权利群之构成。以海域为客体的子权利群由海域所有权、海域使用权、填海权、养殖渔业权、海域租赁权、海域承包经营权、海域役权、海域抵押权所组成,我国法将其中的填海权与养殖渔业权归入海域使用权范畴。该章所关注的是以海域为客体的子权利群的整体布局,以及子权利群中各权利之客体及性质的界定。文章第四章阐释了以自然资源为客体的子权利群之构成。现阶段,我国法律层面的海域上之自然资源唯有渔业资源与矿产资源两种。渔业资源所有权与矿产资源所有权均为国家所享有的所有权,捕捞渔业权与矿业权分别是以渔业资源与矿产资源为客体的物权性质的准物权,矿业权之租赁权与矿业权之抵押权均是在矿业权上设立的权利,上述权利共同构成了海域上的以自然资源为客体的子权利群。第五章研究了海域上权利群中各权利的关系及协调。该章不仅分析了以海域为客体的子权利群内部各权利的关系及协调,探讨了以自然资源为客体的子权利群内部各权利的关系及协调,还对两个子权利群间各权利的关系进行了论述。
[Abstract]:The current law of our country adopts the legislative technique of separating the sea area completely from the natural resources contained in the sea area, which makes the construction of the right group system in the sea area of our country have distinct Chinese characteristics. Based on the comprehensive analysis of the current law, this paper tries to describe the whole context of the system of rights groups in the sea area of our country from the perspective of the theory of explanation, and then under this framework, Combing the rights in the system of right groups and the relationship between the rights, the results of the study are fed back to the suggestion of amending the law. The thesis is divided into five chapters: the first chapter analyzes the basic theory of the rights group in the sea area. It specifically defines the meaning of the rights group in the sea area and its existence area, compares the rights in the sea area with the rights on the land as a whole, takes the separation of the sea area from the natural resources in the sea area as the way of thinking. Two subsystems of the right group system in the sea area are divided. The second chapter discusses the object of the right group in the sea area. In the course of discussing the object status of the sea area, the paper studies the historical form of the sea area by using the method of historical analysis, and discusses the object status of the sea area of our country from the standpoint of interpretation theory through the method of legal hermeneutics. In the study of the object status of natural resources, the author focuses on three aspects: one is the independent object status of natural resources, the other is the specificity of natural resources. The third is the difference between natural resources as the object of right and individuals that constitute natural resources. The third chapter analyzes the composition of the sub-rights group which takes the sea area as the object. The sub-rights group, which takes the sea area as the object, consists of the ownership of the sea area, the right to use the sea area, the right to fill the sea, the right to culture and fishery, the right to lease the sea area, the right to contract and manage the sea area, the right of sea area servitude, the right The right of reclamation and the right of aquaculture and fishery are classified as the right to use the sea area by Chinese law. This chapter focuses on the overall layout of the sub-rights group, and the definition of the object and nature of the rights in the sub-rights group. The fourth chapter explains the composition of the sub-rights group, which takes the natural resources as the object. At present, there are only two kinds of natural resources in the legal level of our country: fishery resources and mineral resources. Both the ownership of fishery resources and the ownership of mineral resources are owned by the state. Fishing fishery rights and mining rights are quasi-real rights with the object of fishery resources and mineral resources, respectively. Both the lease right of mining right and the mortgage right of mining right are the rights established on mining right. These rights together form the sub-rights group of natural resources in the sea area. The fifth chapter studies the relationship and coordination of the rights in the rights groups in the sea area. This chapter not only analyzes the relationship and coordination of various rights within the sub-rights group with the sea area as the object, but also probes into the relationship and coordination of the rights within the sub-rights group with the natural resources as the object. The relationship between the two rights groups is also discussed.
【学位授予单位】:大连海事大学
【学位级别】:博士
【学位授予年份】:2016
【分类号】:D922.294
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 谭论;王倩;田洪军;;海域使用权抵押发展现状、问题及对策[J];海洋开发与管理;2015年10期
2 李志文;刘文钊;;国家主权视阈下的无居民海岛所有权[J];社会科学辑刊;2014年05期
3 余果;;国外矿业权与土地使用权关系简析[J];国土资源情报;2014年07期
4 BORIS STRAUCH;ANASTASIYA KOROLCHENKO;代海军;;德国、法国、俄罗斯和日本矿业法的共同点与区别[J];华北科技学院学报;2014年06期
5 曹宇;;矿业权登记的理论反思与修正面向[J];河北法学;2014年05期
6 康纪田;;矿业法不应允许矿业权出租的三条理由[J];中国煤炭;2013年11期
7 胡家强;刘洋;;海域使用权抵押担保法律问题探析[J];中国海洋大学学报(社会科学版);2013年03期
8 李显冬;杨城;;关于《矿产资源法》修改的若干问题[J];中国国土资源经济;2013年04期
9 尹田;;抵押权效力若干问题研究[J];河南财经政法大学学报;2013年01期
10 王兴胜;;认真对待海域物权——以我国海域役权制度的构建为视角[J];法制博览(中旬刊);2012年12期
相关会议论文 前2条
1 康纪田;;重构矿产资源产权制度[A];生态文明法制建设——2014年全国环境资源法学研讨会(年会)论文集(第一册)[C];2014年
2 郑瀛;;填海造地法律性质研究 从我国首例不服非法用海行政处罚案谈起[A];中国海洋学会2005年学术年会论文汇编[C];2005年
相关重要报纸文章 前1条
1 刘凡勇;;采矿权的承包、出租与抵押[N];中国矿业报;2013年
相关博士学位论文 前6条
1 陈仪;自然资源国家所有权的公权性质研究[D];苏州大学;2015年
2 欧阳君君;自然资源特许使用的理论建构与制度规范[D];苏州大学;2015年
3 黄萍;自然资源使用权制度研究[D];复旦大学;2012年
4 于会国;中国捕捞限额制度研究[D];中国海洋大学;2009年
5 黄军;国家所有权行使论[D];武汉大学;2005年
6 崔凤友;海域使用权制度之研究[D];中国海洋大学;2004年
,本文编号:1823940
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/jingjifalunwen/1823940.html