我国艺术品拍卖市场的法律规制研究
发布时间:2018-04-30 15:04
本文选题:艺术品拍卖市场 + 不正当竞争行为 ; 参考:《江西财经大学》2015年硕士论文
【摘要】:自1997年《中华人民共和国拍卖法》颁布实施以来,我国拍卖行业已步入有序化、法制化和正规化的发展轨道。尽管我国针对拍卖业的立法相对于其他国家而言较为完整,但如今,由于《拍卖法》颁布的时间太过久远,它对拍卖市场,尤其是艺术品拍卖市场的规制早已力所不及,无法遏制当前艺术品拍卖市场中出现的种种不法行为。艺术品拍卖业因其拍卖标的的高风险性而有别于其他商品拍卖。作为拍卖标的物的艺术品,其本身真伪难辨,缺乏统一的定价标准,交易时的信息不对称,加之“声明不保真”条例的滥用,这些特殊的情况大大地提高了现行法案的执行难度。与此同时,作为拍卖市场上的明星产品,艺术品拍卖交易无疑吸引了大量投资者的目光。作为人们对拍卖市场了解的一个重要窗口,其交易状况必然成为拍卖市场的风向标。艺术品拍卖市场的走势和发展的好坏将直接影响投资者对其本身乃至对整个拍卖市场的信任和兴趣,也是影响着整个行业是否能健康稳定发展的重要因素。所以,对于艺术品拍卖市场的全面整顿已成为当务之急,而其中,对于我国艺术品拍卖市场的法律规制问题则是重中之重。然而,目前我国关于拍卖市场法律规制的相关研究虽不在少数,但是专门针对艺术品拍卖市场法律规划的研究却十分有限。因此,本文将立足现状,基于前人经验及自我总结,对此问题进行研究。本文主要分为五个部分,第一部分是以拍卖的定义及特征和艺术品拍卖的范畴及组成部分作为艺术品拍卖的机理进行研究,并梳理了艺术品拍卖的过程。第二部分主要是对我国艺术品拍卖市场的发展和失序的情况进行讨论。同时通过对我国艺术品拍卖市场发展的历史进行梳理,从而归纳出艺术品拍卖市场失序的几点主要表现。本文第三部分讨论了我国目前艺术品拍卖市场的立法现状和立法缺陷的问题。本文第四部分则通过研究西方经济发达国家和地区对艺术品拍卖市场的立法与规制手段来找到我国可以借鉴的相关理论和实践经验,包括对拍卖人、鉴定师和免责条款等发面的经验借鉴。本文第五部提出了强化市场准入、强化拍卖中涉假行为的法律追究制度、建立声明不保真条款的救济机制以及加强行业自律监管这几点完善我国艺术品拍卖市场法律规制的建议。
[Abstract]:Since the promulgation and implementation of the auction Law of the people's Republic of China in 1997, the auction industry in China has entered the track of orderly, legalized and regularized development. Although our country's legislation on auction industry is relatively complete compared with other countries, now, because the auction law has been promulgated for too long, it has long been unable to regulate the auction market, especially the art auction market. Unable to curb the current art auction market in the emergence of various illegal behavior. The art auction industry is different from other commodity auctions because of the high risk of its subject matter. Works of art, which are the subject of auction, are hard to tell whether they are true or false, lack of uniform pricing standards, asymmetric information when they are traded, and the abuse of the "declaration of unfidelity" regulations. These special circumstances have greatly increased the difficulty of implementing the current Act. At the same time, as a star in the auction market, the art auction undoubtedly attracted the attention of a large number of investors. As an important window for people to understand the auction market, its trading situation must become the vane of auction market. The trend and development of the art auction market will directly affect the investors' trust and interest in itself and the whole auction market. It is also an important factor that affects the healthy and stable development of the whole industry. Therefore, the overall rectification of the art auction market has become an urgent task, among which, the legal regulation of the art auction market in China is the most important. However, although there are not a few studies on the legal regulation of the auction market in our country, the research on the legal planning of the art auction market is very limited. Therefore, based on the status quo, based on previous experience and self-summary, this paper will study this problem. This paper is divided into five parts. In the first part, the definition and characteristics of auction, the category and component of art auction as the mechanism of art auction are studied, and the process of art auction is combed. The second part mainly discusses the development and disorder of Chinese art auction market. At the same time, by combing the history of the development of the art auction market in China, this paper summarizes the main manifestations of the disorder in the art auction market. The third part of this paper discusses the current legislation and defects of the art auction market in China. The fourth part of this paper studies the legislation and regulation of art auction market in western developed countries and regions to find the relevant theory and practical experience that our country can use for reference, including to the auctioneers. Appraiser and exemption clause and other facade experience for reference. The fifth part of this paper proposed to strengthen the market access, strengthen the auction related to the fraud of the legal investigation system, It is suggested to establish a relief mechanism for declaring non-fidelity clauses and to strengthen the self-regulation of the industry in order to improve the legal regulation of the art auction market in China.
【学位授予单位】:江西财经大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2015
【分类号】:D922.294
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 魏天祥;全国艺术品拍卖研讨会综述[J];理论前沿;1996年11期
2 朱其;;当代艺术品拍卖“天价做局”[J];共产党员;2008年14期
3 季涛;;艺术品拍卖中“惯例”与《拍卖法》的冲突[J];中国拍卖;2006年06期
4 钟雯;;艺术品拍卖与市场运作[J];贵州社会主义学院学报;2007年03期
5 ;田涛:当前文物艺术品拍卖中的三大法律纠纷[J];中国拍卖;2006年09期
6 林华;;中国艺术品拍卖步入矫正期[J];华人时刊;2010年03期
7 于晔;;一槌不定音的艺术品拍卖[J];法庭内外;2011年05期
8 ;数字[J];数据;2011年04期
9 刘双舟;;从法律角度解读文物艺术品拍卖规程[J];中国拍卖;2010年07期
10 ;文化前线[J];当代贵州;2014年08期
相关会议论文 前1条
1 ;北京文物艺术品拍卖的繁荣与思考[A];当代北京研究(2012年第3期)[C];2012年
相关重要报纸文章 前10条
1 王s,
本文编号:1825031
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/jingjifalunwen/1825031.html