竞争法视野中互联网不当干扰行为的判断标准——兼评“非公益必要不干扰原则”

发布时间：2018-05-10 08:03

本文选题：不正当竞争 + 屏蔽广告　；参考：《法学》2015年05期

【摘要】：我国互联网领域发生的多起影响重大的不正当竞争案件均与经营者通过技术手段阻碍、干扰、修改其他经营者的互联网产品或服务有关,此类行为可类型化为互联网不当干扰行为。经营者的营业权益是一种未被法律明确规定而受原则性条款保护的法益,其权益的边界要受到其他竞争者的行为自由和消费者利益的限制。对干扰行为进行正当性判断是一个利益衡量的过程,目的、手段、损害后果应动态地被考量。消费者利益在互联网竞争中也是认定竞争行为是否正当的一个重要考量因素,能够形成对经营者权益的限制。要完善司法规则,除承认公益目的的干扰行为正当性之外,还应赋予用户选择权,允许一定条件下基于用户选择的干扰行为正当化。
[Abstract]:Many cases of unfair competition that have a significant impact on the Internet in China are all related to the obstruction, interference and modification of other operators' Internet products or services by the operators through technical means. This kind of behavior can be classified as improper interference on the Internet. The business rights and interests of the operator is a kind of legal interest which is not clearly stipulated by the law and protected by the principle clause. The boundary of its rights and interests is restricted by the behavior freedom of other competitors and the interests of consumers. Judging the legitimacy of interference is a process of interest measurement. The purpose, means and consequences of damage should be considered dynamically. Consumer interests are also an important factor in determining whether competitive behavior is justified in Internet competition, which can restrict the rights and interests of operators. In order to perfect the judicial rules, in addition to acknowledging the legitimacy of interference behavior for public purposes, users should also be given the option to justify the interference behavior based on the user's choice under certain conditions.
【作者单位】：南京农业大学人文社会科学学院;
【基金】：江苏省教育厅“青蓝工程”资助
【分类号】：D922.294

【参考文献】