别嘌醇片垄断协议案行政处罚的法律适用问题探究——基于《反垄断法》第46条的规范分析

发布时间：2018-05-16 22:36

本文选题：别嘌醇片 + 垄断协议　；参考：《江西财经大学学报》2017年03期

【摘要】：经营者达成并实施限制竞争的垄断协议行为,是各国反垄断法律重点规制的经济性垄断行为之一。2016年2月,国家发改委发布了对国内五家药企达成别嘌醇片垄断协议案的行政处罚决定。对照中国《反垄断法》第46条对垄断协议行为行政责任的规定,国家发改委的处罚决定存在罚款比例和数额过低、没收违法所得处罚缺失和缺乏对违法行为的结果有效纠正措施等问题,致使《反垄断法》规制违法垄断行为的立法规范和立法目的在具体个案中不能实现。有鉴于此,应当加强中国三大反垄断执法机关之间的协调,统一反垄断执法的理念;制定具体的、合理的罚款标准和没收违法所得的认定标准,指导反垄断执法机关的反垄断执法工作;细化具体的违法垄断行为不良后果的救济措施。通过以上三个方面的工作,进一步规范和完善中国的反垄断执法,形成对实施垄断违法行为经营者的有效威慑,保护消费者的利益。
[Abstract]:It is one of the economic monopolistic behaviors which are mainly regulated by the anti-monopoly laws of various countries to conclude and implement monopoly agreement to restrict competition. In February 2016, The National Development and Reform Commission (NDRC) has issued a decision on administrative penalties for five drug companies to reach a monopoly agreement on allopurinol tablets. In the light of Article 46 of China's Anti-monopoly Law on administrative liability for monopolistic agreement acts, the proportion and amount of fines imposed by the NDRC's penalty decisions are too low. The lack of penalty for confiscation of illegal income and the lack of effective corrective measures to the result of illegal behavior lead to the failure of the legislative norm and legislative purpose of regulating illegal monopoly behavior in specific cases. In view of this, we should strengthen coordination among the three major anti-monopoly law enforcement agencies in China, unify the concept of anti-monopoly law enforcement, formulate specific and reasonable standards for fines and standards for determining the confiscation of illegal income, To guide the antitrust enforcement work of the antitrust law enforcement agencies and to refine the specific relief measures for the adverse consequences of illegal monopoly behavior. Through the above three aspects of work to further standardize and improve China's anti-monopoly law enforcement to form an effective deterrent to the implementation of monopoly illegal activities operators to protect the interests of consumers.
【作者单位】：江西财经大学法学院;
【基金】：国家社会科学基金一般项目“互联网行业反垄断问题研究”(13BFX118) 江西省高校人文社科项目“互联网产业的反垄断法适用问题研究”(07132017) 江西省高校人文社会科学重点研究基地研究项目“产业政策与公平竞争审查制度研究”(JD16045)
【分类号】：D922.294

【相似文献】