当前位置:主页 > 法律论文 > 经济法论文 >

旅游合同的惩罚性赔偿制度研究

发布时间:2018-05-18 21:07

  本文选题:旅游合同 + 违约 ; 参考:《北京外国语大学》2017年硕士论文


【摘要】:在我国,惩罚性赔偿制度适用于侵权领域已被广泛接受,但对于合同领域是否可以适用还存在着争议。随着我国经济的不断发展,作为第三产业支柱的旅游消费市场不断扩大,越来越多的人选择在假日外出旅游。对此,我国于2013年制定了《中华人民共和国旅游法》,该法的内容全面,包含了多方面的内容,其中最引人关注的就是在旅游合同中引入了惩罚性赔偿制度。目前,学术界对于旅游合同中适用惩罚性赔偿制度的研究不是很多,一般只是简单地介绍惩罚性赔偿制度内容,及对该制度进行对比,将其与精神损害赔偿制度进行对比或再讨论知识产权、环境保护法等中是否要引用惩罚性赔偿制度时引用旅游合同的例子。在这种背景下,本文通过深入探讨惩罚性赔偿制度的概念内涵、特殊功能、适用的正当性及立法、实践中运用等问题,研究旅游合同中适用惩罚性赔偿制度问题,充分了解我国现行《旅游法》中关于旅游合同适用惩罚性赔偿制度,有助于充分运用我国旅游合同惩罚性赔偿制度,丰富和完善我国旅游合同中的惩罚性赔偿制度基本理论,加大旅游行业的司法保护力度,规范旅游市场的发展,扼制旅游社的恶意违约行为,促进司法公正。本文通过概括介绍惩罚性赔偿制度的概念、历史发展和功能,分析惩罚性赔偿制度存在的必要性及旅游合同中引入的合理性,比较分析该制度同其他损害赔偿责任区别,了解该制度所具有的独特价值。正文分为四个部分,具体如下:第一部分,论述惩罚性赔偿制度的概念。通过分析惩罚性赔偿的定义,了解惩罚性赔偿制度的历史发展和我国现阶段关于惩罚性赔偿制度的规定,认识惩罚性赔偿制度的内涵及其特殊功能。第二部分,旅游合同中引入惩罚性赔偿的合理性。论述惩罚性赔偿同补偿性赔偿、精神损害赔偿的关系,表明惩罚性制度具有独有的价值,突出旅游合同的特殊性论述旅游合同中引入惩罚性赔偿的必要性和可行性。第三部分,通过《旅游法》关于旅游合同中适用惩罚性赔偿制度的规定,分析旅游合同惩罚性赔偿的构成要件和其存在的一些不足和问题。第四部分,针对我国旅游合同中惩罚性赔偿制度存在的问题,从实体法和司法实践、程序法三个方面提出相关的解决措施。
[Abstract]:In our country, the punitive damages system has been widely accepted in the field of tort, but there are still disputes about whether it can be applied in the field of contract. With the development of our economy, the tourism consumption market, which is the pillar of the tertiary industry, is expanding, and more people choose to travel on holidays. In this regard, China enacted the Tourism Law of the people's Republic of China in 2013, which contains a wide range of contents, and the most noticeable one is the introduction of punitive damages in tourism contracts. At present, there are not many studies on the application of punitive damages system in tourism contracts in academic circles. Generally speaking, the content of punitive damages system is simply introduced, and the system is compared. Comparing it with the system of compensation for mental damage or discussing whether the system of punitive damages should be used in intellectual property law, environmental protection law, and so on, it is necessary to cite the examples of tourism contract. In this context, this paper studies the application of punitive damages in tourism contracts through in-depth discussion of the concept, special functions, legitimacy and legislation of application, and application in practice. It is helpful to make full use of the punitive damages system of tourism contracts and enrich and perfect the basic theory of punitive damages system in tourism contracts. The judicial protection of tourism industry should be strengthened, the development of tourism market should be standardized, the malevolent breach of contract of tourism agency should be curbed, and judicial justice should be promoted. This paper introduces the concept, historical development and function of punitive damages system, analyzes the necessity of punitive damages system and the rationality of its introduction in tourism contracts, and compares the differences between the system and other damages liability. Understand the unique value of the system. The text is divided into four parts: the first part discusses the concept of punitive damages system. By analyzing the definition of punitive damages, we can understand the historical development of punitive damages system and the provisions of punitive damages system at present in our country, and understand the connotation and special function of punitive damages system. The second part, the rationality of introducing punitive damages into tourism contract. This paper discusses the relationship between punitive damages and compensatory damages and spiritual damages, which indicates that the punitive system has its unique value, and emphasizes the particularity of tourism contracts to discuss the necessity and feasibility of introducing punitive damages into tourism contracts. In the third part, through the provisions of "Tourism Law" on the application of punitive damages in tourism contracts, this paper analyzes the constitutive requirements and some shortcomings and problems of punitive damages in tourism contracts. The fourth part, aiming at the problems existing in the punitive damages system of tourism contract in our country, puts forward the relevant solutions from three aspects: substantive law, judicial practice and procedural law.
【学位授予单位】:北京外国语大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:D922.294

【相似文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 刘仲秋,王贺洋;惩罚性赔偿制度的应用[J];西南农业大学学报(社会科学版);2004年02期

2 程爱军;;惩罚性赔偿制度的民族适应性分析[J];中共太原市委党校学报;2006年01期

3 龚斌;;论我国惩罚性赔偿制度的立法完善[J];湖南财经高等专科学校学报;2006年02期

4 阳高峰;朱玉;;论我国惩罚性赔偿制度的建立[J];商场现代化;2006年28期

5 于斌;;惩罚性赔偿制度研究[J];科技经济市场;2006年12期

6 房文静;;浅论我国惩罚性赔偿制度的建立[J];法制与社会;2007年01期

7 邢希萌;;浅谈惩罚性赔偿制度的完善[J];北方经贸;2007年06期

8 于朝印;;美国惩罚性赔偿制度探析——兼论惩罚性赔偿制度在我国立法中的确立[J];中国矿业大学学报(社会科学版);2007年04期

9 李杰;;对惩罚性赔偿制度的思考[J];毕节学院学报;2008年03期

10 戴江波;;试论惩罚性赔偿制度[J];山西警官高等专科学校学报;2009年02期

相关会议论文 前9条

1 柯新华;;试论我国惩罚性赔偿制度的构建[A];规划·规范·规则——第六届中国律师论坛优秀论文集[C];2006年

2 罗冠杰;;论惩罚性赔偿制度在我国药品安全责任领域的建立[A];2009年中国药学会药事管理专业委员会年会暨“国家药物政策与《药品管理法》修订研究”论坛论文文集[C];2009年

3 王阿丽;;商品房买卖中惩罚性赔偿制度分析[A];规划·规范·规则——第六届中国律师论坛优秀论文集[C];2006年

4 沈薇;;论电视购物买卖中的惩罚性赔偿制度[A];当代法学论坛(二○一○年第1辑)[C];2010年

5 赵欣怡;;《环境保护法》修改之环境法律责任的完善——浅析惩罚性赔偿制度对环境民事侵权责任的借鉴[A];可持续发展·环境保护·防灾减灾——2012年全国环境资源法学研究会(年会)论文集[C];2012年

6 周晋凌;李s,

本文编号:1907212


资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/jingjifalunwen/1907212.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户f3cfe***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com