反垄断承诺制度中利害关系人的权益保护

发布时间：2018-05-20 06:44

本文选题：反垄断 + 承诺制度　；参考：《西南政法大学》2015年硕士论文

【摘要】：反垄断承诺方式结案已是许多国家或地区的普遍实践。在反垄断调查中,执法机构通过与涉嫌垄断的经营者磋商、谈判,达成和解,以解决反垄断纠纷。这种执法方式提高了执法效率、节约了执法成本,为反垄断提供了新思路。我国2008年起施行的《反垄断法》引进了该制度并在反垄断实践中加以运用,但是,由于没有建立配套的利害关系人权益保护机制,我国现行的反垄断承诺制度存在对利害关系人权益保护不力的问题。这显然违背了我国《反垄断法》的立法宗旨,削弱了我国反垄断承诺制度存在的根基。因此,研究我国反垄断承诺制度中利害关系人的权益具有重大的理论意义和现实意义。本文通过采用文献分析、法条解析、实证分析、比较研究等方法,将视角聚焦于反垄断承诺制度中利害关系人权益保护的相关问题,从反垄断承诺的基本理论入手,分析了我国反垄断承诺制度存在利害关系人权益保护不力的现状及存在的问题,结合境外国家或地区反垄断承诺中利害关系人权益保护的经验,最终提出完善我国反垄断承诺制度中利害关系人的权益保护的建议。除引言和结论外,本文主体内容分为三个部分。第一部分为反垄断承诺制度中利害关系人权益保护的基本理论。阐述反垄断承诺制度的滥觞,结合行政法理论界定反垄断承诺制度中利害关系人的概念,总结利害关系人的构成要件及基本范围,此处写作的难点在于利害关系人构成要件中因果关系的判断以及间接购买者是否属于利害关系人的基本范围。在界定利害关系人的基础上运用法理学、经济法理论剖析承诺制度中利害关系人权益的内涵,并分析承诺制度中利害关系人权益保护的必要性。通过该部分的论述,为后文的具体展开做好充分的理论铺垫。第二部分为我国反垄断承诺制度中利害关系人权益保护的现状以及问题。此部分运用规范研究、实证分析等方法,考察我国反垄断承诺制度在立法和运行中对于利害关系人的权益保护,总结出我国反垄断承诺制度中利害关系人权益保护存在的问题,言明本文撰写所要解决的问题。第三部分是完善我国反垄断承诺制度中利害关系人权益保护的建议。针对我国反垄断承诺制度中利害关系人权益保护存在的问题,梳理和借鉴美国、欧盟、我国台湾地区等多个国家和地区反垄断承诺制度中利害关系人权益保护的立法和执法经验,最终提出促进我国反垄断承诺制度中利害关系人的权益保护的思路。首先,我国反垄断承诺制度中利害关系人的权益保护应遵循三大原则:第一,利益平衡原则;第二,程序参与原则;第三,有效救济原则。其次,提出具体思路,此为该部分写作的创新点和难点,主张从规范执法机关的裁量权、促进利害关系人的程序参与、建立和解金分配制度、健全纠纷解决机制、完善反垄断承诺制度与反垄断民事诉讼的衔接等五个方面保护利害关系人的权益。
[Abstract]:In the antitrust investigation, the law enforcement agencies have negotiated, negotiated, and reached settlement in order to settle the antitrust disputes in the antitrust investigation. This method of law enforcement improves the efficiency of law enforcement, saves the cost of law enforcement, and provides a new way of thinking for antitrust. Since 2008, China has provided a new way of thinking. The implementation of the anti-monopoly law introduced the system and applied it in the practice of antitrust. However, because of the lack of a supporting mechanism for protecting the interests of the people, the current anti-monopoly commitment system in our country has a problem of protecting the interests of the interests of the people. This has obviously violated the legislative purpose of China's "antitrust law" and weakened it. Therefore, it is of great theoretical and practical significance to study the interests of the stakeholders in the system of anti-monopoly commitment in China. This paper focuses on the interests of the interests of the interests of the anti-monopoly commitments in the system of anti-monopoly commitment by using the methods of literature analysis, law analysis, empirical analysis and comparative research. On the basis of the basic theory of anti-monopoly commitment, this paper analyzes the current situation and existing problems of the protection of the interests of the interests of the people in the anti-monopoly commitment system in our country, and proposes to improve the interests of the system of anti-monopoly commitment in China at the end of the paper, combining the experience of the protection of the interests of the interests of the interests of the interests of the interests of the foreign countries or regions. In addition to the introduction and conclusion, the main content of this article is divided into three parts. The first part is the basic theory of the protection of the interests of the stakeholders in the system of antitrust commitment. It expounds the origin of the system of antitrust commitment, and defines the concept of the interests of the stakeholders in the antitrust system with the theory of administrative law, and summarizes the benefits of the system. The important elements and the basic scope of the victims are the judgment of the causality in the constitutive requirements of the interested persons and whether the indirect buyer is the basic scope of the interests of the stakeholders. On the basis of defining the interested persons, it uses jurisprudence and economic jurisprudence to analyze the interests of the interests of the stakeholders in the system of commitment. The second part is the present situation and problems of the protection of the interests of the interests of the stakeholders in the system of anti-monopoly commitment in China. The part uses normative research, empirical analysis and other methods to investigate the status and problems of the protection of the interests of the interests of the people in the anti trust system of our country. In the legislation and operation of China's anti-monopoly commitment system, the rights and interests of the interests of the interests of the people are protected, and the problems in the protection of the interests of the interests of the stakeholders in the system of anti-monopoly commitment in China are summarized, and the problems to be solved are discussed. The third part is the suggestion to improve the protection of the interests of the interests of the stakeholders in the system of anti-monopoly commitment in China. The existing problems in the protection of the interests of the interests of the interests of the anti-monopoly commitment system in China, combing and drawing on the legislation and law enforcement experience of the interests protection of the interests of the interests of the interests of the United States, the European Union and the Taiwan region of China and other countries and regions, and finally put forward the interests and interests of the stakeholders in the system of anti-monopoly commitment in China. First, the principle of interest balance should be followed: first, the principle of balance of interests; second, the principle of procedural participation; third, the principle of effective relief. Secondly, it puts forward specific ideas, which is the creative point and difficulty of this part, and advocates the discretion of the law enforcement agencies to promote the benefit. There are five aspects of protecting the rights and interests of the interested persons in the five aspects of the procedural participation of the injured people, the establishment of the system of reconciliation gold distribution, the improvement of the dispute settlement mechanism, and the improvement of the connection between the system of antitrust commitment and the civil action of antitrust.
【学位授予单位】：西南政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：D922.294

【相似文献】