论经营者集中的反垄断审查

发布时间：2018-05-21 20:28

本文选题：经营者集中 + 申报标准　；参考：《黑龙江大学》2015年硕士论文

【摘要】：“马士基、地中海航运、达飞”(简称P3,下文均使用P3代表马士基、地中海航运、达飞)设立网络中心案是第二起被商务部禁止的经营者集中案件,影响涉及国内外,受到各界广泛的关注。文章首先以商务部禁止P3设立网络中心的裁决理由为出发点,通过比较中国、美国、欧盟对P3设立网络中心的审查结果,分析了案件体现的我国经营者集中反垄断审查制度中存在的核心法律问题。之后介绍了我国的经营者集中审查制度,包括申报制度、实体审查制度、程序审查制度。尽管制度设计较为全面,但其中仍然存在一些缺陷,比如申报标准指引性不够,相关市场界定模糊,执法不透明等。与中国相比,欧美立法成熟、执法经验丰富,通过学习比较美国、欧盟的相关法律,并对其执法机构以及经营者集中审查制度的特征加以研究,得出我国应该建立统一的反垄断执法机构、增加配套法规的启示。最后总结出我国完善反垄断审查制度要遵循的原则,并提出正确界定相关市场、加强执法透明度、完善执法程序、细化相关规定等具体的建议。
[Abstract]:The case of "Maersk Line, Mediterranean Shipping, Dafe" (hereinafter referred to as P3 for Maersk Line, Mediterranean Shipping, and Dafe) is the second case of concentration of operators banned by the Ministry of Commerce, affecting both domestic and foreign operators. Received extensive attention from all walks of life. First of all, based on the decision of the Ministry of Commerce to prohibit P3 from setting up a network center, the article compares the results of the review of P3's setting up a network center in China, the United States and the European Union. This paper analyzes the core legal problems existing in the centralized antitrust examination system in China. Then it introduces the centralized examination system, including the declaration system, the entity review system and the procedural review system. Although the system design is more comprehensive, but there are still some shortcomings, such as the reporting standards are not enough guidelines, the relevant market definition is vague, enforcement is not transparent and so on. Compared with China, Europe and the United States have mature legislation and rich law enforcement experience. By studying and comparing the relevant laws of the United States and the European Union, and studying the characteristics of their law enforcement agencies and the centralized censorship system of operators, It is concluded that China should establish a unified anti-monopoly law enforcement agency and increase the enlightenment of supporting laws and regulations. Finally, it summarizes the principles to be followed in perfecting the anti-monopoly examination system in China, and puts forward some concrete suggestions, such as defining the relevant market correctly, strengthening the transparency of law enforcement, perfecting the law enforcement procedure, and refining the relevant regulations and so on.
【学位授予单位】：黑龙江大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：D922.294

【相似文献】