瑕疵出资股东的表决权限制研究

发布时间：2018-06-04 22:48

本文选题：出资瑕疵 + 股东权利　；参考：《广东财经大学》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】：针对现实中越来越严峻的出资瑕疵问题,通过让股东承担相应的违约责任以及补缴出资义务等传统的手段显然已不足以妥善解决。若要更好地督促股东及时补足出资,应当对其表决权进行适当限制,削弱其在公司经营管理当中的话语权,从而间接影响其在公司中获取的收益,令之主动履行出资义务,维护公司和其他股东等利益相关人的权益。本文旨在探讨是否应对出资瑕疵的股东的表决权加以限制,并针对限制的具体途径提供相应的对策建议。本文的第一章,主要阐述瑕疵出资的含义和相关的类型,并讨论出资瑕疵是否会对股东的资格以及权利等造成影响。第二章,主要分析表决权限制的合理性。首先,从不同类型的股权出发,讨论在出资瑕疵的情况下,是否应对股东的某种类型的权利进行限制。其次,深入剖析表决权的内涵与特性,得出其属于股东基础性权利的结论,并分析其是否属于应当限制的股权类型。再次,根据相关的法律原则、立法目的和章程约定等,从反面论述瑕疵出资股东行使完整的表决权缺乏正当性。最后,从正面阐述限制股东表决权制度的积极作用。第三章,具体阐述由哪些主体提出对瑕疵出资股东进行表决权限制,确定此类主体范围的合理性和可行性;并且,按照由内到外,从公司自治到法律强制的顺序,提出通过章程、股东会决议以及法律法规等形式,对股东表决权进行限制。第四章,结合法律规定以及公司自治等两个层面,提出完善表决权限制制度的相关策略。同时,为了做好限制表决权之后的衔接工作,给出了有关股东表决权的恢复和完善股东除名制度的合理化建议。
[Abstract]:In view of the more and more serious investment defects in reality, it is obvious that the traditional means, such as letting shareholders bear the corresponding default responsibility and repaying the contribution obligation, are not enough to solve the problem properly. If shareholders are to be better urged to make up their capital contributions in a timely manner, they should restrict their voting rights appropriately, weaken their right to speak in the course of the company's operation and management, and indirectly affect the profits they earn in the company and make them take the initiative to fulfill their contribution obligations. Safeguard the rights and interests of stakeholders such as the company and other shareholders. The purpose of this paper is to discuss whether the voting rights of shareholders with defective capital contribution should be restricted, and to provide corresponding countermeasures and suggestions for the specific ways of limitation. In the first chapter, the meaning and relevant types of defective capital contribution are discussed, and the influence of the defect on the qualification and rights of shareholders is discussed. The second chapter mainly analyzes the rationality of the restriction of voting rights. First of all, from different types of equity, the paper discusses whether shareholders' rights should be restricted in the case of defective capital contribution. Secondly, the connotation and characteristics of voting rights are deeply analyzed, and the conclusion that voting rights belong to the basic rights of shareholders is obtained, and whether they belong to the types of equity that should be restricted. Thirdly, according to the relevant legal principles, legislative purposes and articles of association, the negative side of the investment shareholders exercise the integrity of the voting rights is lack of legitimacy. Finally, the positive role of the system of restricting shareholders' voting rights is explained from a positive perspective. In chapter three, the author specifically states which subjects should limit the voting rights of defective shareholders, and determine the rationality and feasibility of the scope of such subjects; and according to the order from internal to external, from corporate autonomy to legal enforcement, Through articles of association, shareholders resolution and laws and regulations to limit the voting rights of shareholders. The fourth chapter, combining the legal provisions and corporate autonomy, puts forward the relevant strategies to perfect the voting rights restriction system. At the same time, in order to do a good job of linking up after restricting voting rights, this paper gives some reasonable suggestions on the restoration of shareholder voting rights and the perfection of shareholder delisting system.
【学位授予单位】：广东财经大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D922.291.91

【参考文献】