信用证业务中的“抗辩”

发布时间：2018-06-08 20:56

本文选题：信用证业务 + 开证行　；参考：《中国外汇》2016年20期

【摘要】：正信用证业务下权利抗辩具有"须主张性"的原因,不仅仅在于权利抗辩的权利属性,还在于权利抗辩效力的产生未必能给权利人带来益处。近年爆发的信用证纠纷案件中有三起比较典型:青岛凯扬进出口集团有限公司v.H银行(以下简称"青岛凯扬案"),China New Era International Ltd.v.B银行(以下简称"中国新时代案")以及Swiss Singapore Overseas
[Abstract]:In the business of the letter of credit, the right defense of the right of credit has the "need to be asserted", not only in the right property of the right defense, but also in the effect of the right of defense may not bring benefits to the right holder. In recent years, there are three typical cases of the letter of credit dispute: Qingdao Kaiyang import and Export Group Co., Ltd., v.H Bank (hereinafter referred to as " Qingdao Kaiyang case "," China New Era International Ltd.v.B bank "(hereinafter referred to as" China new era case ") and Swiss Singapore Overseas
【作者单位】：北京银行杭州分行国际业务部;
【分类号】：D922.28;F740.4

【相似文献】