我国隐名股东身份确认法律问题研究

发布时间：2018-06-10 05:42

本文选题：隐名股东 + 显名股东　；参考：《西南科技大学》2015年硕士论文

【摘要】：股东身份的取得实质上需要出资,形式上需要显名。作为一名适格的股东,二者应是一致的,但是隐名股东的出现导致了上述特征在主体上的分离,为股东身份确认带来了诸多难题。本文首先从理论上界定了隐名股东的概念,并在此基础上揭示出隐名股东的特征,通过与相关概念进行比较,划定本文写作边界。其次对隐名股东形成原因进行了分析,并将其归纳为规避法律型隐名股东和非规避法律型隐名股东。接着论述隐名股东身份确认的现状及存在的问题。首先是对现状进行介绍,主要包括立法及司法现状。先论述我国现行公司法律制度,再从典型案例出发对司法裁判进行评析,从而引出我国隐名股东股东身份确认现行法律存在的问题,主要表现为隐名股东法律地位不明以及隐名股东显名化的标准缺失。随后又介绍了域外关于隐名股东问题的一些规定,主要介绍了英美以及日韩的一些法律制度,并在对比分析的基础上进行借鉴。首先明确隐名股东不是股东,当然不享有股东权利,其次在隐名股东身份确认标准上摒弃传统的“二元说”,而采用“修正说”,即坚持“形式说”为原则,“实质说”为例外。最后是对隐名股东身份确认的法律完善。本文认为对隐名股东的股东身份进行司法确认,在实体上至少应满足以下条件:实际出资或继受公司股权、存在合法的代持股协议、公司中除显名股东以外的其他股东半数以上同意;同时还应在程序上充分保障公司中其他股东的诉讼权利,并严格限制债权人等第三人进入隐名股东身份确认之诉中。
[Abstract]:The acquirement of shareholder identity needs capital contribution in essence, and explicit name in form. As a suitable shareholder, the two should be consistent, but the emergence of hidden shareholders leads to the separation of the above characteristics on the subject, which brings many difficulties to the identification of shareholders. This paper first defines the concept of dormant shareholders theoretically, and on this basis reveals the characteristics of dormant shareholders, and delimits the writing boundary of this paper by comparing them with related concepts. Secondly, it analyzes the reasons for the formation of dormant shareholders, and concludes them as legal evading dormant shareholders and non-circumventing dormant shareholders. Then it discusses the status quo and existing problems of anonymous shareholders' identity confirmation. The first is to introduce the current situation, mainly including legislation and judicial status. This paper first discusses the current corporate legal system of our country, then evaluates the judicial decision from typical cases, thus leads to the problems existing in the confirmation of the status of anonymous shareholders in our country. The main manifestation is that the legal status of anonymous shareholders is unknown and the standard of anonymous shareholders is missing. Then, it introduces some regulations about hidden shareholders in foreign countries, mainly introduces some legal systems of Britain and America, Japan and South Korea, and draws lessons from them on the basis of comparative analysis. First of all, it is clear that hidden shareholders are not shareholders, and of course they do not enjoy the rights of shareholders. Secondly, the traditional "dualism" is abandoned in the criteria of identification of hidden shareholders, and the principle of "modified theory" is adopted, that is, "form theory" is adhered to. The theory of substance is an exception. Finally, the legal perfection of the identification of anonymous shareholders. In this paper, the author holds that to confirm the shareholder identity of the dormant shareholder, the following conditions should be satisfied in the entity at least: there is a legal proxy stock holding agreement in the actual capital contribution or subsequent share ownership of the company. More than half of the shareholders in the company except the obvious shareholders agree; at the same time, the litigation rights of the other shareholders in the company should be fully protected, and the third party such as creditors should be strictly restricted to the action of anonymous shareholder identity confirmation.
【学位授予单位】：西南科技大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：D922.291.91

【共引文献】