矿业公司股权转让的案例分析

发布时间：2018-06-11 09:47

本文选题：股权转让 + 矿业权　；参考：《兰州大学》2015年硕士论文

【摘要】：原、被告双方签订了《股权转让协议》,被告在支付原告900万元后停止继续支付所谓的股权转让款,产生了纠纷,诉辩双方就违约责任和赔偿事宜进行诉辩,而争议的焦点实质为矿业公司《股权转让协议》的效力问题。本文以王某某等二人诉某公司股权转让纠纷案引入,从分析案例争议的实质焦点入手,得出争议焦点实质为矿业公司《股权转让协议》的效力问题,进而研究了矿业权的特殊性所导致的矿业公司股权转让的有效性认定问题,对有效、无效和综合考量三个方面的观点逐一加以分析,对这个问题,不仅从理论层面上进行剖析,从司法实践上也做了进一步研究。本文的研究,必将在调整国家资源利益与个人财产利益,在既要加强矿业监管又要促进矿业发展繁荣上提供一种思路,起到借鉴作用。本文分三章。第一章主要介绍了一例典型的矿业公司股权转让纠纷案例,并做简要分析；第二章从案例争议焦点展开分析,分析了法律概念、相关规定,研究了转让行为性质的认定问题,并对各种观点逐一进行了分析,理清了矿业公司股权转让的效力认定问题和赔偿责任认定；第三章是对策和建议,从社会、司法和矿业公司三个层面,给出了意见建议。
[Abstract]:Originally, the two sides of the defendant signed an agreement on the transfer of shares. After paying the plaintiff 9 million yuan, the defendant ceased to pay the so-called transfer of shares, resulting in a dispute. Both parties complained about the liability for breach of contract and the matter of compensation. The essence of the dispute is the validity of the equity transfer agreement. This paper introduces the dispute of equity transfer between Wang and so on two people v. a company. From the analysis of the substantive focus of the case dispute, the author draws the conclusion that the essence of the dispute is the validity of the equity transfer agreement of the mining company. Then, the paper studies the validity of mining company's equity transfer caused by the particularity of mining right, analyzes the three aspects of efficiency, invalidation and comprehensive consideration one by one, and analyzes this problem not only from the theoretical level, but also from a theoretical perspective. Further research has also been done in judicial practice. The research in this paper will provide a way of thinking to adjust the national resource interests and personal property interests, strengthen the mining supervision and promote the development and prosperity of the mining industry, and play a reference role. This paper is divided into three chapters. The first chapter mainly introduces a typical case of mining company equity transfer dispute case, and makes a brief analysis; the second chapter from the focus of the case dispute analysis, analysis of the legal concept, relevant provisions, study the nature of the transfer of the problem, The author analyzes the various viewpoints one by one, and clarifies the validity of equity transfer and liability recognition of mining companies; the third chapter is the countermeasures and suggestions, from the social, judicial and mining companies three levels, gives suggestions.
【学位授予单位】：兰州大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：D922.287

【参考文献】