我国垄断协议豁免制度的完善

发布时间：2018-06-25 16:36

本文选题：反垄断法 + 竞争　；参考：《深圳大学》2017年硕士论文

【摘要】：反垄断法律制度作为一国经济制度的法律基石,通过规制违法的垄断行为,从而实现其维护市场竞争、促进市场经济健康发展、提高社会公众的整体福利等方面的重大作用。众所周知,垄断协议作为一种严重破坏市场竞争的行为,不仅破坏了正常的市场竞争秩序,还损害了消费者应有的福利,所以各国的反垄断立法都将垄断协议作为反垄断法的核心内容予以规制,在立法上禁止经营者达成垄断协议,但是垄断协议并非一无是处,某些垄断协议的达成有可能还会起到重大的积极作用,因此,出于产业政策、行业特点、经济效益等方面的综合衡量,各国在禁止垄断协议之时,还规定了垄断协议豁免制度,即对那些积极作用大于消极影响的垄断协议网开一面,允许其在一定条件下合法存续。它体现了反垄断法在规制垄断协议这种具有积极和消极双重作用的经济行为时所进行的一种利益权衡。本文围绕着如何完善我国的豁免制度进行论证,笔者首先就我国豁免制度的立法、执法以及司法现状分别进行论述,通过列表的方式,将发改委和工商部门公布的垄断协议案件逐一进行分析总结;其次,笔者通过对立法和实施现状进行分析,总结得出我国垄断协议豁免制度存在的诸多问题,如执法权设置不科学、执法资源有限、立法规定不完善、程序制度匮乏、当事人权益维护困难、反垄断执法缺乏有效监督等问题;第三,笔者对域外的垄断协议豁免制度作了简要介绍;最后一部分是本篇论文的精华,通过上述三个部分的铺垫,笔者在这个部分给出了我国垄断协议豁免制度完善的具体建议,涉及到反垄断执法机构、豁免范围、豁免条件及豁免程序的完善,如明确核心限制的具体类型、准确界定相关市场的界限及经营者所占的市场份额、增加垄断协议对竞争影响的动态考量、明确界定消费者的外延、关注消费者获得的预期利益、将效率收益作为豁免的衡量标准之一、重构反垄断执法机关的架构、明确豁免审查时限、加强执法的监督等完善建议。
[Abstract]:As the legal cornerstone of a country's economic system, the anti-monopoly legal system plays an important role in maintaining market competition, promoting the healthy development of market economy and improving the overall welfare of the public by regulating illegal monopoly behavior. As we all know, as a serious act of undermining market competition, monopoly agreements not only undermine the normal order of market competition, but also damage the welfare of consumers. Therefore, the anti-monopoly legislation of all countries all take monopoly agreement as the core content of anti-monopoly law to regulate, prohibit the operator from entering into the monopoly agreement in legislation, but the monopoly agreement is not useless. The conclusion of certain monopoly agreements may also play a significant positive role. Therefore, in view of the comprehensive measurement of industrial policies, industry characteristics, economic benefits, and other aspects, countries have also stipulated a monopoly agreement exemption system when prohibiting monopoly agreements. That is to say, monopoly agreements which have more positive effects than negative effects are allowed to exist legally under certain conditions. It reflects an interest tradeoff of antitrust law in regulating monopoly agreement, which has both positive and negative effects on economic behavior. This article revolves around how to consummate our country's immunity system to carry on the demonstration, the author first carries on the elaboration to our country immunity system legislation, the law enforcement and the judicial present situation separately, through the list way, The monopoly agreement cases published by the NDRC and the industrial and commercial departments are analyzed and summarized one by one. Secondly, through the analysis of the legislation and implementation status quo, the author concludes that there are many problems in the exemption system of the monopoly agreement in China. For example, the establishment of law enforcement power is not scientific, the law enforcement resources are limited, the legislative provisions are not perfect, the procedure system is deficient, the rights and interests of the parties are difficult to safeguard, the anti-monopoly law enforcement lacks effective supervision and so on; third, The last part is the essence of this paper, through the above three parts of the foreshadowing, the author gives the specific suggestions of perfecting the exemption system of the monopoly agreement in this part. Involving anti-monopoly law enforcement agencies, the scope of exemption, the conditions of exemption and the perfection of exemption procedures, such as defining the specific types of core restrictions, accurately defining the boundaries of relevant markets and the market share occupied by operators, Increasing the dynamic consideration of monopoly agreement's impact on competition, defining clearly the extension of consumers, paying attention to the expected benefits obtained by consumers, taking efficiency gains as one of the measures of exemption, and reconstructing the framework of anti-monopoly law enforcement agencies. Clear exemption review time limit, strengthen the supervision of law enforcement and other perfect suggestions.
【学位授予单位】：深圳大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D922.294

【相似文献】