反垄断中价格协同行为的认定及其规制逻辑

发布时间：2018-06-27 03:38

本文选题：协同行为 + 信息交流　；参考：《北京理工大学学报(社会科学版)》2017年05期

【摘要】：囿于反托拉斯法的巨大威慑力,市场主体很少采用公开的协议型或决议型卡特尔,而是尽可能地隐匿信息交流,通过精心的设计来达成"地下卡特尔",这也使协同行为的认定和规制成为竞争法上的难题。波斯纳等学者主张抛开主观方面而依赖客观的"经济学证据"来证明协同行为。经济学上的寡头依赖性理论、分析哲学上奥利弗·布莱克的逻辑分析、法学上的协同合意特殊性论证,都说明协同行为的认定及规制不能"绕开"主观因素。聚焦于主观方面,通过对信息交流的类型化分析和效率权衡,建构以"信息"为要义的规制逻辑,可能是对抗协同行为的有效路径。反垄断法对协同行为的规制应保持谦抑性,需要与价格法等部门法相互配合。
[Abstract]:Due to the great deterrent power of antitrust law, the main body of the market seldom adopts the open agreement type or the resolution type cartel, but conceals the information exchange as far as possible. Through careful design to achieve "underground cartel", this makes the identification and regulation of synergistic behavior become a difficult problem in competition law. Posner and other scholars claim to put aside subjective aspects and rely on objective "economic evidence" to prove synergistic behavior. The theory of oligarch dependence in economics, the logic analysis of Oliver Black in philosophy, and the particularity of synergetic agreement in law all show that the identification and regulation of synergistic behavior can not "bypass" the subjective factors. Focusing on the subjective aspect, through the type analysis and efficiency tradeoff of information exchange, the construction of regulation logic with "information" as the main meaning may be an effective path to counteract synergistic behavior. The regulation of antitrust law on synergistic behavior should be modest and cooperate with other branches of law such as price law.
【作者单位】：中国人民大学法学院;
【基金】：北京市社会科学基金重大项目资助“法学方法和史学方法贯通性研究”(15ZDA41)
【分类号】：D922.294

【相似文献】