对电网企业的反垄断法规制研究

发布时间：2018-07-07 15:39

本文选题：自然垄断 + 电网公司　；参考：《江西财经大学》2015年硕士论文

【摘要】：我国电力事业在改革开放的三十年内,电力事业取得了巨大的进步,已经完全摆脱了缺电的基本国情,并向着世界级的电力国家稳步迈进。恰恰是这30年的快速发展给电网本身带来了一些弊端,社会上对电网改革的呼声越来越高,比如电网滥用市场支配地位的问题。要解决电网目前存在的问题,必须通过改革的方式进行。电网体制可以包括五大部分,它们分别是发电、输电、配电、售电、调度。要对电网企业进行改革必须从这五大部分入手,本文通过对我国电力体制和电网企业进行全面的分析,指出我国电网企业应该按照业务的属性,对业务进行划分,对于竞争的业务应该放开,对于垄断的业务可以维持垄断。在西方国家,尤其是德国,对于电网企业的规制对我们有很好的借鉴意义。德国在规制电网企业的时候也有过困惑。最开始时,德国引入“核心设施”理论,将电网归于核心设施,并用法律规定了电网企业必须对所有的市场主体开放,并且规制电网企业开放收取的价格。在电网企业收取的价格方面,德国完成了成本监管向激励监管的转变。这个做法既有利于社会,又有利于电网企业的发展。西方其他国家的改革大多都是放开发电和售电,监管输电和配电,这都是我国电网企业改革可以借鉴的地方。目前,我国电网企业依然拥有着发电、输电、配电、售电这4大业务。在发电领域,电网企业在用新能源发电,我们需要向西方学习,把发电和售电业务脱离出电网企业,放归市场,在市场上自由竞争,提高他们的效率。对于输电和售电领域,我们可以维持输电领域的垄断,在配电领域适当的放开竞争。在我国电网企业中,调度也是电网企业的组成部分,应该将其脱离电网企业,成为一个独立的部门,或者成为国家的一个机构。
[Abstract]:During the thirty years of reform and opening up, the electric power industry of our country has made great progress, has completely got rid of the basic situation of power shortage, and has made steady progress towards the world-class power country. The rapid development of these 30 years has brought some disadvantages to the power grid itself, and the calls for the reform of the power grid have become increasingly high, such as the abuse of the dominant position of the power grid. In order to solve the problems existing in the power grid, we must carry out the reform. The grid system can consist of five parts: generation, transmission, distribution, distribution and dispatching. In order to reform the power grid enterprises, we must start with these five parts. Through the comprehensive analysis of the electric power system and the power grid enterprises in our country, this paper points out that the power grid enterprises in our country should divide the business according to the attributes of the business. For competitive business should be liberalized, for monopoly business can maintain monopoly. In western countries, especially in Germany, the regulation of grid enterprises has a good reference for us. Germany has also been confused when it comes to regulating power grid companies. In the beginning, Germany introduced the theory of "core facilities", attributed the power grid to the core facilities, and stipulated by law that grid enterprises must be open to all market subjects, and regulate the prices that grid enterprises open to charge. In terms of prices charged by grid companies, Germany has completed the shift from cost regulation to incentive regulation. This practice is both conducive to society, but also conducive to the development of power grid enterprises. Most of the reforms in other western countries are to liberalize power generation and sell electricity, supervise transmission and distribution, which can be used for reference in the reform of China's power grid enterprises. At present, China's power grid enterprises still have generation, transmission, distribution, electricity sales these four major business. In the field of power generation, grid companies are using new energy to generate electricity, and we need to learn from the West to separate generation and electricity sales from grid companies, to put them back into the market, to compete freely in the market and to improve their efficiency. In the field of transmission and distribution, we can maintain the monopoly in the field of transmission and open up competition appropriately in the field of distribution. In China, dispatching is also a part of power grid enterprises, which should be separated from the grid enterprises and become an independent department or an organization of the country.
【学位授予单位】：江西财经大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：F426.61;D922.294

【参考文献】