经营性国有资产流失认定的偏差与制度修正
发布时间：2018-07-16 20:09
【摘要】：源于对我国上一轮国企改革中国资巨额流失的心有余悸,以及对国企经营者"内部人控制"的深度担忧,实践中,对国有资产流失的认定存在着诸多偏差。这直接抑制了国企经营者的改革动力,制约了改革的深化和市场机制的进一步完善。为此,今后我国立法者应摒弃国有资本的"刚性资本"思维,坚持"行为规制"理念,从价格评估机制的市场化、竞价交易机制的透明化以及经营中国资流失认定的合理化角度对现行法予以修正,从而既保护国有资产安全,又有效推动改革,提升改革效率。
[Abstract]:In practice, there are many deviations in the determination of the loss of state-owned assets due to the palpation of the huge loss of Chinese capital in the last round of SOE reform and the deep concern about the "insider control" of SOE operators. This directly restrains the reform motive force of the state-owned enterprise operator, restricts the deepening of the reform and the further improvement of the market mechanism. Therefore, in the future, Chinese legislators should abandon the thinking of "rigid capital" of state-owned capital, adhere to the idea of "behavior regulation", and start with the marketization of price evaluation mechanism. The transparency of the bidding trading mechanism and the rationalization of the management of Chinese capital loss can not only protect the security of state-owned assets, but also effectively promote the reform and improve the efficiency of the reform.
【作者单位】： 华东政法大学经济法学院;
【基金】：国家社科基金一般项目“市场化背景下国有资本运营公司法律制度创新”(项目编号:14BFX166)的阶段性研究成果
【分类号】：D922.291
本文编号：2127537
[Abstract]:In practice, there are many deviations in the determination of the loss of state-owned assets due to the palpation of the huge loss of Chinese capital in the last round of SOE reform and the deep concern about the "insider control" of SOE operators. This directly restrains the reform motive force of the state-owned enterprise operator, restricts the deepening of the reform and the further improvement of the market mechanism. Therefore, in the future, Chinese legislators should abandon the thinking of "rigid capital" of state-owned capital, adhere to the idea of "behavior regulation", and start with the marketization of price evaluation mechanism. The transparency of the bidding trading mechanism and the rationalization of the management of Chinese capital loss can not only protect the security of state-owned assets, but also effectively promote the reform and improve the efficiency of the reform.
【作者单位】： 华东政法大学经济法学院;
【基金】：国家社科基金一般项目“市场化背景下国有资本运营公司法律制度创新”(项目编号:14BFX166)的阶段性研究成果
【分类号】：D922.291
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前7条
1 阮雪梅;;经营性国有资产托管法律供给的不足与完善[J];湖南社会科学;2007年03期
2 屈茂辉,肖海军;建立经营性国有资产代表人制度[J];政法论坛;2002年06期
3 韩弘力;;公益诉讼是防范经营性国有资产流失的新路径[J];长春理工大学学报(社会科学版);2008年01期
4 胡蓉;;对行政事业性国有资产监管的立法思考[J];湖北行政学院学报;2011年04期
5 ;失控的权力导致腐败——从三起案例看国企经营者违法违纪特点及监督机制问题[J];中国经贸导刊;1999年16期
6 张海军;;试论我国国企经营者薪酬的法律规制[J];法制与经济(下旬);2012年01期
7 吴伯乔;;著作权集体管理组织的垄断行为规制[J];中国高新技术企业;2013年31期
相关会议论文 前1条
1 赵梅;;经营性国有资产所有权属性与国资委的身份定位[A];当代法学论坛（2006年第4辑）[C];2006年
相关重要报纸文章 前3条
1 陈丽洁;经营性国资 国资法主要调整对象[N];中国证券报;2004年
2 刘纪鹏;关于制定《国有资本法》的建议[N];中国经济时报;2004年
3 史尧尧;四大要点照耀产权市场[N];证券日报;2008年
，本文编号：2127537
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/jingjifalunwen/2127537.html
