有限责任公司股东盈余分配请求权研究

发布时间：2018-07-24 13:04

【摘要】：股东以公司出资者的身份向公司要求分配盈余,是其所享有的固有权利。有限责任公司具有一定封闭的特性,转让股权存在一定的障碍,此时在股东的盈余分配请求权被他人或其公司侵害时,我国现行公司法提供的几种保护途径(包括异议股东公司回购股权的请求权、提起确认无效的诉讼、可撤销的诉讼和股权转让退出公司等方法)都存在着针对性不强,保护力度不够,司法成本过高等不足之处,难以真正起到有效的保护作用。鉴于强制盈余诉讼制度的缺失,我国司法实践一般都不支持股东盈余分配的诉讼请求,但也有个别案件做出了相反的判决,出现了各地同案不同判的现象。我国应该借鉴欧美的先进立法及实践经验,建立我国的强制盈余分配诉讼制度。在公司存在可分配利润而控制公司的股东恶意不分配时,允许股东在穷尽内部救济后提起盈余分配诉讼。需要强调的是我国引入强制盈余分配诉讼的同时,必须强调司法介入的边界,保持司法介入和公司自治的平衡。
[Abstract]:It is an inherent right for shareholders to ask the company to distribute surplus as a corporate investor. Limited liability companies have certain closed characteristics, and there are certain obstacles to the transfer of equity, when the shareholders' claim for the distribution of earnings is infringed upon by others or their companies, Several ways of protection provided by the current company law of our country (including the claim right of dissenting shareholder company to buy back the share right, the lawsuit of confirming invalidity, the revocable action and the method of transferring and withdrawing from the company etc.) are not targeted. Inadequate protection, too high judicial costs and other deficiencies, can not really play an effective role in protection. In view of the lack of compulsory surplus litigation system, the judicial practice of our country generally does not support the litigation request of shareholders' surplus distribution, but there are some individual cases that have made the opposite judgment, and the phenomenon of different judgments in various co-cases appears. Our country should draw lessons from the advanced legislation and practical experience of Europe and America to establish our compulsory surplus distribution litigation system. When the company has distributable profits and controls the company's shareholders maliciously do not distribute, the shareholder is allowed to bring the surplus distribution lawsuit after exhausting the internal relief. It is necessary to emphasize the boundary of judicial intervention and maintain the balance between judicial intervention and corporate autonomy while introducing compulsory surplus distribution litigation.
【学位授予单位】：内蒙古大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D922.291.91

【相似文献】