公路收费制度不宜由行政法规确立

发布时间：2018-07-29 06:43

【摘要】：交通运输部公布的《修订征求意见稿》调整了收费公路的性质、收费期限、收费形式等重要公路收费制度。其中,增加高速公路偿债期结束后基于管养目的的收费,既不具备现行《公路法》与《预算法》上的依据,也与现行《公路法》的相关禁止性规定抵触,并与《公路法》确立的"费改税"进程相悖。而《修订征求意见稿》调整公路收费年限、明确省级政府统一收费制度的内容,因其触及中央与地方在高速公路建设与管理方面的事权与财责分配,也涉及到政府还贷公路管理企业债务转换为政府债务的重要财政问题,依《立法法》第8条的立法保留要求,需要通过修改《公路法》的方式进行,而不宜由修改行政法规的形式确立。
[Abstract]:The revised draft for soliciting opinions issued by the Ministry of Communications and Transport adjusts the important highway toll system such as the nature of toll roads, the toll period, and the form of toll collection. Among them, the increase in tolls for the purpose of custody and maintenance after the end of the repayment period of the expressway does not have any basis in the current Highway Law and the Budget Law, nor does it conflict with the relevant prohibition provisions of the current Highway Law. And with the road law established the "fee to tax" process. The "revised draft for soliciting opinions" adjusts the number of years of highway tolling and clarifies the content of the unified toll collection system of provincial governments, because it touches on the distribution of administrative powers and financial responsibilities between the central and local governments in the construction and management of highways. It also involves the important financial issue of converting the debts of the government's highway management enterprises into government debts. In accordance with the legislative reservation requirement of Article 8 of the Legislative Law, it needs to be carried out by way of amending the Highway Law. It is not suitable to be established by the form of modification of administrative laws and regulations.
【作者单位】：东南大学法学院;
【基金】：作者承担的东南大学交通学院交通运输规划博士后研究项目成果作者参加的2011年国家社会科学基金重大项目“现代城市交通发展的制度平台与法律保障机制研究”的阶段性研究成果
【分类号】：D922.296

【参考文献】