竞争法视角下知识产权正当性反思

发布时间：2018-07-31 18:36

【摘要】：知识产权制度伴随着科学技术和商品经济的快速发展而产生。然而经过实践证明,知识产权制度运行除了具有促进社会经济发展的正面价值功能以外,还往往因其负面价值功能的存在而引起人们的正当性追问。当下社会,知识产权侵权方式正随着社会主义市场经济的快速发展而不断改变,与知识产权相关的各种法律制度也在社会快速发展的进程里逐渐显现出明显的缺陷与不足。本文主要以财产权劳动理论、人格理论、激励理论三种理论作为知识产权正当性理论基础,重点把这三种理论与竞争法紧密结合起来,站在竞争法视角对三种知识产权正当性理论基础进行解读。其次,通过理论基础发现现实社会存在的具体矛盾,如知识产权与人权、知识垄断与自由竞争、知识产权与发展权的矛盾等,然后将理论基础、矛盾表现、矛盾分析结合起来,并针对《反不正当竞争法》与《反垄断法》在矛盾分析中表现出的问题,从明确调整对象的主体范围,完善不正当竞争行为,制定限制调整对象的行为规范,明确监管责任、加强监管力度等方面给出相关的结论与建议。知识产权正当性研究已经是社会快速发展不得不面对的问题,要想彻底避免知识产权过度保护或知识产权滥用等问题是不可能的。但是任何国家在面对这一问题是都不能坐以待毙,要找准矛盾的根本,抓住问题的关键,力求从各学科、各角度提供解决问题的建议,全力维护市场经济健康稳定发展。毕竟,知识产权制度作为一种合理的利益分配机制,如果能够妥善构建各方利益者之间的关系,就可以更好地体现知识产权保护的正当性。
[Abstract]:The intellectual property system is accompanied by the rapid development of science and technology and the commodity economy. However, the practice has proved that, in addition to the positive function of promoting the social and economic development, the operation of the intellectual property system is often caused by the existence of its negative value function. The mode is changing with the rapid development of the socialist market economy, and the various legal systems related to intellectual property are also gradually showing obvious defects and shortcomings in the process of rapid social development. This paper mainly takes the three theories as the theoretical basis of intellectual property right by property rights labor theory, personality theory and incentive theory. The foundation is to combine the three theories and competition law closely, and to interpret the theoretical basis of the legitimacy of the three kinds of intellectual property right from the perspective of competition law. Secondly, through the theoretical basis, we find the concrete contradictions in the actual social existence, such as intellectual property rights and human rights, knowledge monopoly and self competition, the contradiction between intellectual property rights and the right to development, and so on. The theoretical basis, the contradiction performance and the contradiction analysis are combined, and according to the problems expressed in the contradiction analysis of the anti unfair competition law and the antimonopoly law, it gives the aspects of adjusting the subject scope of the object, perfecting the unfair competition behavior, formulating the behavior norm of restricting the adjusting object, defining the supervision responsibility and strengthening the supervision. The research on the legitimacy of intellectual property rights has been a problem that the rapid development of the society has to face. It is impossible to avoid the problem of excessive protection of intellectual property rights and the abuse of intellectual property rights. However, any country can not wait for death in the face of this problem. It is necessary to find the key to the contradiction and grasp the key to the problem. In order to maintain the healthy and stable development of the market economy, the intellectual property system, after all, as a reasonable distribution mechanism of interest, can better realize the legitimacy of the protection of intellectual property rights, after all, as a reasonable distribution mechanism of interests.
【学位授予单位】：中原工学院
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D922.294;D923.4

【相似文献】