特定资产收益权信托纠纷的司法认定——安信信托与昆山纯高案评析
发布时间：2018-08-13 14:09
【摘要】：资产收益权信托类纠纷的司法认定,应考虑收益权信托产生的背景,明确其本质为避法行为,根据实质重于形式的原则,区别对待违反监管规则的责任与融资合同的效力。安信信托与昆山纯高案应依据信托法处理当事人之间的权利义务,明确收益权是否属于适格的信托财产,信托关系是否成立并生效等问题。从公众投资者利益保护出发,应肯定其信托贷款之实,并据此认定当事人之间的权利义务。
[Abstract]:The judicial determination of the disputes of asset profit right trust should consider the background of profit right trust, make clear that its essence is the behavior of evading law, according to the principle that substance is more important than form, we should treat the responsibility of violating the regulation and the effect of financing contract differently. Anxin Trust and Kunshan Chungao case should deal with the rights and obligations between the parties according to the Trust Law and make clear whether the right to profit belongs to the appropriate trust property and whether the trust relationship is established and effective. Based on the protection of public investors' interests, the trust and loan should be confirmed, and the rights and obligations between the parties should be determined accordingly.
【作者单位】： 北京工商大学法学院;西南财经大学、中铁信托博士后创新实践基地博士后流动站;
【基金】：国家法治与法学理论研究项目“不动产信托登记法律制度研究”(项目编号:14SFB50032)
【分类号】：D922.282
[Abstract]:The judicial determination of the disputes of asset profit right trust should consider the background of profit right trust, make clear that its essence is the behavior of evading law, according to the principle that substance is more important than form, we should treat the responsibility of violating the regulation and the effect of financing contract differently. Anxin Trust and Kunshan Chungao case should deal with the rights and obligations between the parties according to the Trust Law and make clear whether the right to profit belongs to the appropriate trust property and whether the trust relationship is established and effective. Based on the protection of public investors' interests, the trust and loan should be confirmed, and the rights and obligations between the parties should be determined accordingly.
【作者单位】： 北京工商大学法学院;西南财经大学、中铁信托博士后创新实践基地博士后流动站;
【基金】：国家法治与法学理论研究项目“不动产信托登记法律制度研究”(项目编号:14SFB50032)
【分类号】：D922.282
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 陆忠行;;在“信托”的名义下——对信托创新产品的一些思考[J];金融法苑;2004年00期
2 裴欣;;资产收益权信托的法律分析[J];中国律师;2014年03期
3 李书宇;;信托公司规范发展的法律政策环境亟待改善[J];内蒙古金融研究;2009年03期
4 祁洪亮;;“资产收益权”信托产品的风险防范[J];现代经济信息;2013年19期
5 范黎红;周荃;;从十年涉讼看信托公司运营问题及对策——以涉信托公司商事案件为样本[J];北京政法职业学院学报;2013年02期
6 邹盈颖;试论信托立法[J];宁波大学学报(人文科学版);1995年03期
7 陈雪萍;;信托的担保功能在商事活动中的运用——以Quistclose信托为视角[J];法商研究;2007年06期
8 那坤;高岩;;浅论我国信托业法之构建[J];中共郑州市委党校学报;2008年01期
9 吕茂春;;挂钩信托类银行理财产品法律风险刍议[J];现代金融;2008年11期
10 郑，
本文编号：2181221
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/jingjifalunwen/2181221.html
