互联网领域反不正当竞争法一般条款的具体化进路——兼评不正当竞争纠纷司法裁判规则
发布时间：2018-08-18 18:21
【摘要】：面对新型互联网领域的反不正当纠纷,法院在适用《反不正当竞争法》一般条款时,时常会分析一般条款的内涵,创立有普遍适用性的互联网不正当竞争司法裁判规则,以实现抽象一般条款的具体化。这些司法裁判规则虽然有助于明晰裁判标准,但往往在内涵或外延上对一般条款有突破,存在逻辑断裂。《反不正当竞争法》一般条款的抽象性和不确定性是由其功能决定的,其具体化确实需要形成次级规则。但这种次级规则的建立,关键在于法官在个案中进行充分说理,形成"个案规范"。在此基础上,通过类型化方法,可以逐渐探索和形成不同类型反不正当竞争纠纷的适用规则。
[Abstract]:In the face of the new type of anti-unfair disputes in the field of Internet, courts often analyze the connotation of general terms when applying the general provisions of Anti-unfair Competition Law, and create universally applicable judicial rules of unfair competition on the Internet. To realize the concretization of abstract general clauses. Although these rules are helpful to clarify the standards of adjudication, they often break through the general terms in connotation or extension, and there are logical breakdowns. The abstract and uncertainty of the general provisions of Anti-unfair Competition Law are determined by their functions. Its materialization does require the formation of secondary rules. However, the key to the establishment of this secondary rule lies in the judge's reasoning in the case and the formation of the case norm. On this basis, through the typology, we can gradually explore and form the applicable rules of different types of anti-unfair competition disputes.
【作者单位】： 对外经济贸易大学法学院;
【基金】：“对外经济贸易大学研究生科研创新基金资助”,项目编号(20140441)
【分类号】：D922.294
本文编号：2190300
[Abstract]:In the face of the new type of anti-unfair disputes in the field of Internet, courts often analyze the connotation of general terms when applying the general provisions of Anti-unfair Competition Law, and create universally applicable judicial rules of unfair competition on the Internet. To realize the concretization of abstract general clauses. Although these rules are helpful to clarify the standards of adjudication, they often break through the general terms in connotation or extension, and there are logical breakdowns. The abstract and uncertainty of the general provisions of Anti-unfair Competition Law are determined by their functions. Its materialization does require the formation of secondary rules. However, the key to the establishment of this secondary rule lies in the judge's reasoning in the case and the formation of the case norm. On this basis, through the typology, we can gradually explore and form the applicable rules of different types of anti-unfair competition disputes.
【作者单位】： 对外经济贸易大学法学院;
【基金】：“对外经济贸易大学研究生科研创新基金资助”,项目编号(20140441)
【分类号】：D922.294
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前5条
1 代洪军;;竞争法中一般条款的司法实现[J];韶关学院学报;2007年01期
2 蔡敏;;“返还”促销行为的法律分析与一般条款的适用[J];法制与社会;2007年09期
3 何国华;论竞争法中一般条款的地位——以一般条款的特性为中心[J];北京化工大学学报(社会科学版);2004年04期
4 高西庆;夏丹;;证监会在解释和发展证券法中的作用[J];证券市场导报;2006年04期
5 ;[J];;年期
相关硕士学位论文 前1条
1 刘建臣;利益衡量视角下《反不正当竞争法》一般条款的适用研究[D];华东政法大学;2016年
，本文编号：2190300
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/jingjifalunwen/2190300.html
