论网络行业滥用市场支配地位的法律规制
发布时间：2018-08-23 09:44
【摘要】：我国正处于网络爆发式增长的时期,网络市场中网络企业寡头渐见眉头,占优势地位的网络企业滥用市场支配地位的现象逐渐增多,损害网络市场竞争和消费者利益的情况也日渐加剧。而目前我国对于网络行业中出现的滥用支配地位损害竞争的行为的研究尚处探讨阶段,对出现在反垄断执法实践中的网络市场性质界定不清,相关市场界定模糊,滥用市场支配地位的行为认定不准确,消费者利益没有得到充分的保护,存在反垄断执法混乱的现象。究其原因就在于对网络市场的市场性质考察不够充分,对网络市场与传统市场认定滥用市场支配地位之间的关系没有很好捋清,并且执行与监管之间的权责不明、协调不足。欧美对于规制网络市场中滥用市场支配地位的经验值得借鉴,我国在规制网络行业滥用支配地位行为的方面,应当将重心放在界定网络市场的性质特征与传统认定方法的结合上,优化执行与监管的协调、完善我国承诺执行制度、提高对消费者利益的保护,构建完善的网络行业滥用市场支配地位的法律规制体系。
[Abstract]:Our country is in the period of network explosive growth. In the network market, the oligarchs of network enterprises have gradually seen their eyebrows, and the phenomenon of dominant network enterprises abusing their dominant position in the market has gradually increased. The situation that harms network market competition and consumer interest also day by day aggravation. At present, the research on the behavior of abuse of dominant position to damage competition in the network industry in our country is still in the stage of discussion. The nature of the network market appearing in the practice of anti-monopoly law enforcement is not clear, and the definition of the relevant market is vague. The behavior of abusing the dominant position of the market is not accurate, the interests of consumers are not fully protected, and there is confusion in the enforcement of antitrust laws. The reason is that the nature of the network market is not enough, the relationship between the network market and the traditional market to abuse the dominant position of the market is not clear, and the power and responsibility between implementation and supervision are not clear, and the coordination is insufficient. The experience of regulating the abuse of dominant position in the network market in Europe and the United States is worth drawing lessons from, and our country is in the aspect of regulating the abuse of dominant position in the network industry. Emphasis should be placed on the combination of defining the nature of the network market and the traditional identification methods, optimizing the coordination between execution and supervision, perfecting our country's commitment enforcement system, and improving the protection of consumers' interests. Build a perfect network industry abuse of market dominance of the legal regulation system.
【学位授予单位】：暨南大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：D922.294
本文编号：2198668
[Abstract]:Our country is in the period of network explosive growth. In the network market, the oligarchs of network enterprises have gradually seen their eyebrows, and the phenomenon of dominant network enterprises abusing their dominant position in the market has gradually increased. The situation that harms network market competition and consumer interest also day by day aggravation. At present, the research on the behavior of abuse of dominant position to damage competition in the network industry in our country is still in the stage of discussion. The nature of the network market appearing in the practice of anti-monopoly law enforcement is not clear, and the definition of the relevant market is vague. The behavior of abusing the dominant position of the market is not accurate, the interests of consumers are not fully protected, and there is confusion in the enforcement of antitrust laws. The reason is that the nature of the network market is not enough, the relationship between the network market and the traditional market to abuse the dominant position of the market is not clear, and the power and responsibility between implementation and supervision are not clear, and the coordination is insufficient. The experience of regulating the abuse of dominant position in the network market in Europe and the United States is worth drawing lessons from, and our country is in the aspect of regulating the abuse of dominant position in the network industry. Emphasis should be placed on the combination of defining the nature of the network market and the traditional identification methods, optimizing the coordination between execution and supervision, perfecting our country's commitment enforcement system, and improving the protection of consumers' interests. Build a perfect network industry abuse of market dominance of the legal regulation system.
【学位授予单位】：暨南大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：D922.294
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 张小强;卓光俊;;论网络经济中相关市场及市场支配地位的界定——评《中华人民共和国反垄断法》相关规定[J];重庆大学学报(社会科学版);2009年05期
2 李太勇;网络效应与进入壁垒:以微软反垄断诉讼案为例[J];财经研究;2000年08期
3 刘大为;李凯;;用户多归属与双边平台竞争的均衡分析[J];东北大学学报(自然科学版);2012年01期
4 焦海涛;;我国经营者承诺制度的适用与完善[J];当代法学;2012年02期
5 王先林;;论反垄断法实施中的相关市场界定[J];法律科学(西北政法学院学报);2008年01期
6 王晓晔;;关于我国反垄断执法机构的几个问题[J];东岳论丛;2007年01期
7 吴韬;;互联网行业反垄断案件中的相关市场界定:美国的经验与启示[J];电子知识产权;2011年05期
8 李剑;;百度“竞价排名”非滥用市场支配地位行为[J];法学;2009年03期
9 曲振涛;周正;周方召;;网络外部性下的电子商务平台竞争与规制——基于双边市场理论的研究[J];中国工业经济;2010年04期
10 蒋岩波;;互联网产业中相关市场界定的司法困境与出路——基于双边市场条件[J];法学家;2012年06期
，本文编号：2198668
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/jingjifalunwen/2198668.html
