社会政策目标的反垄断法豁免标准

发布时间：2018-08-25 19:56

【摘要】：反垄断法的实施面临多种利益冲突,包括经济目标与社会目标的冲突。现代反垄断法在追求经济效率的同时,也应兼顾环境保护和文化多样性保护等社会政策目标。豁免制度是解决利益冲突的主要手段之一。反垄断法主要通过效率抗辩与附属限制理论两条路径来解决社会政策目标的豁免问题。效率抗辩主要适用于能够直接带来经济效率或可以转化为经济效率的社会政策目标豁免;那些难以或不能转化为经济效率的社会政策目标,可以借助附属限制理论寻求豁免。反垄断法豁免制度的分析框架,由此可概括为定量分析与定性分析两种。我国反垄断法中的垄断协议豁免制度,混淆了经济性利益与非经济性利益的区分,统一适用效率抗辩的分析思路,不利于社会政策目标的实现。相比之下,经营者集中豁免制度对此作了区分,但规定的社会公共利益豁免条件又过于宽松。
[Abstract]:The implementation of anti-monopoly law faces a variety of conflicts of interest, including the conflict between economic and social objectives. While pursuing economic efficiency, modern antimonopoly law should also take into account social policy objectives such as environmental protection and cultural diversity protection. Immunity system is one of the main means to solve conflicts of interest. The anti-monopoly law mainly solves the issue of exemption of social policy by efficiency defense and subsidiary restriction theory. Efficiency defense mainly applies to the social policy objective immunity which can directly bring economic efficiency or can be transformed into economic efficiency; those social policy goals which are difficult or unable to be transformed into economic efficiency can seek exemption by means of the theory of subsidiary restriction. The analysis frame of exemption system of anti-monopoly law can be summarized as quantitative analysis and qualitative analysis. The exemption system of monopoly agreement in our country's anti-monopoly law confuses the distinction between economic benefit and non-economic benefit, unifies the analysis thought of applying efficiency defense, and is unfavorable to the realization of the goal of social policy. In contrast, the system of centralized exemption makes a distinction, but the social and public interest exemption conditions are too lenient.
【作者单位】：中国政法大学博士后流动站;安徽大学法学院;
【基金】：司法部国家法治与法学理论项目“我国反垄断法绿色豁免制度的建构”(14SFB30035) 中国经济法学研究会学术研究项目“反垄断法上的公共利益豁免制度研究——以环保豁免为例”
【分类号】：D922.294

【相似文献】