定期租船下船速索赔问题研究
发布时间：2018-09-14 11:44
【摘要】：船速索赔是定期租船下特有的问题,2000年英国期租解释规则的出台、NYPE2015格式范本第12条的亮点、以及英美判例的发展,都证明了船速索赔问题在不断发展,然而我国学界在此方面的研究却比较零散,尚无全面、系统的阐释船速索赔问题的文章。笔者按照案件形成及处理的脉络对文章进行布局,在阅读判例、仲裁裁决的基础上,整合了各方面资料,针对定期租船下船速索赔问题进行细致、深入的研究和探讨,具体如下:第一章阐释了提出船速索赔的必备要素,包括存在船速保证条款、出租方违反船速保证条款两个方面。结合NYPE格式范本和BALTIME格式范本,介绍了船速保证条款的存在形式,对于条款中的"满载" "良好天气" "平均""大约"等限定词进行学理分析及细化解释。第二章归纳分析了出租方面对承租方提出的船速索赔享有哪些免责事由和抗辩事由,依据英国法和中国法相关规定进行分析、比较,得出两国法律虽然对免责和抗辩事由的用词和界定方式不同,但其内涵和外延是基本一致的。第三章解决了证据采信问题,介绍了航海日志和气象导航航次评价报告的优缺点,按照证据是否存在虚假性,划分为一般做法与特殊做法,对比分析了中除法与英国法的相关规定和实践做法。第四章分析索赔金额的计算,先分别阐释传统计算方式和气导报告计算方式下船速索赔金额的计算方法,再探讨燃油节约能否与船速索赔相抵冲,得出二者抵冲符合损益相抵原则和恢复原状原则的结论,并分析了认为不应抵冲之观点的缺陷所在,同时分析了燃油节约金额的计算方式。第五章是针对船速索赔相关问题提出的建议,包括对于船速保证条款的形式和内容的完善建议,以及对于我国船速索赔仲裁中仲裁员的专业性、简易程序的梯度性和临时仲裁制度的引入三方面的完善建议。笔者在此文章中系统的阐释了船速索赔相关问题,以期填补此领域的空白,并为学界、司法界、律师界及租船实务界带来便利。
[Abstract]:The claim for ship speed is a special problem under time chartering. The introduction of the British term charter interpretation rules in 2000 and the bright spot of article 12 of the NYPE2015 model format, as well as the development of British and American jurisprudence, all prove that the problem of ship speed claims is constantly developing. However, the research on this aspect in our country is rather scattered, and there is no comprehensive and systematic explanation of the problem of ship speed claim. According to the formation and processing of the case, the author makes a layout of the article. On the basis of reading the case and the arbitration award, he integrates all aspects of the data and makes a detailed and in-depth study and discussion on the issue of the time chartered ship speed claim. The main contents are as follows: the first chapter explains the essential elements of the ship speed claim, including the existence of the ship speed guarantee clause and the breach of the ship speed guarantee clause by the lessor. Combined with NYPE format and BALTIME format model, this paper introduces the existing form of ship speed guarantee clause, and makes a theoretical analysis and detailed explanation of the terms of "full load", "good weather" and "average" approximately. In the second chapter, the author summarizes and analyzes the reasons of exemption and defense for the lessee's claim for ship speed, and compares it with the relevant provisions of British law and Chinese law. It is concluded that although the terms and definitions of exemption and defense are different between the two countries, their connotations and denotations are basically the same. The third chapter solves the problem of evidence adoption, introduces the advantages and disadvantages of log books and weather navigation voyage evaluation reports, and divides them into general practice and special practice according to whether the evidence is false or not. This paper contrasts and analyzes the relevant provisions and practice of Chinese division and English law. The fourth chapter analyzes the calculation of claim amount, first explains the calculation method of the claim amount of ship speed under the traditional calculation method and the calculation method of gas conduction report, then discusses whether the fuel economy can offset the ship speed claim. A conclusion is drawn that both of them are in line with the principle of profit and loss offset and the principle of restitution, and the defects of the viewpoint that should not be offset are analyzed, and the calculation method of fuel saving amount is analyzed at the same time. The fifth chapter is about the suggestions of the ship speed claim, including the form and content of the ship speed guarantee clause, and the arbitrators' professionalism in the arbitration of the ship speed claim in our country. The gradient of summary procedure and the introduction of temporary arbitration system. In this paper, the author systematically explains the problems related to the ship speed claim, in order to fill the gap in this field, and bring convenience to the academic, judicial, legal and chartering practice circles.
【学位授予单位】：大连海事大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D922.294
[Abstract]:The claim for ship speed is a special problem under time chartering. The introduction of the British term charter interpretation rules in 2000 and the bright spot of article 12 of the NYPE2015 model format, as well as the development of British and American jurisprudence, all prove that the problem of ship speed claims is constantly developing. However, the research on this aspect in our country is rather scattered, and there is no comprehensive and systematic explanation of the problem of ship speed claim. According to the formation and processing of the case, the author makes a layout of the article. On the basis of reading the case and the arbitration award, he integrates all aspects of the data and makes a detailed and in-depth study and discussion on the issue of the time chartered ship speed claim. The main contents are as follows: the first chapter explains the essential elements of the ship speed claim, including the existence of the ship speed guarantee clause and the breach of the ship speed guarantee clause by the lessor. Combined with NYPE format and BALTIME format model, this paper introduces the existing form of ship speed guarantee clause, and makes a theoretical analysis and detailed explanation of the terms of "full load", "good weather" and "average" approximately. In the second chapter, the author summarizes and analyzes the reasons of exemption and defense for the lessee's claim for ship speed, and compares it with the relevant provisions of British law and Chinese law. It is concluded that although the terms and definitions of exemption and defense are different between the two countries, their connotations and denotations are basically the same. The third chapter solves the problem of evidence adoption, introduces the advantages and disadvantages of log books and weather navigation voyage evaluation reports, and divides them into general practice and special practice according to whether the evidence is false or not. This paper contrasts and analyzes the relevant provisions and practice of Chinese division and English law. The fourth chapter analyzes the calculation of claim amount, first explains the calculation method of the claim amount of ship speed under the traditional calculation method and the calculation method of gas conduction report, then discusses whether the fuel economy can offset the ship speed claim. A conclusion is drawn that both of them are in line with the principle of profit and loss offset and the principle of restitution, and the defects of the viewpoint that should not be offset are analyzed, and the calculation method of fuel saving amount is analyzed at the same time. The fifth chapter is about the suggestions of the ship speed claim, including the form and content of the ship speed guarantee clause, and the arbitrators' professionalism in the arbitration of the ship speed claim in our country. The gradient of summary procedure and the introduction of temporary arbitration system. In this paper, the author systematically explains the problems related to the ship speed claim, in order to fill the gap in this field, and bring convenience to the academic, judicial, legal and chartering practice circles.
【学位授予单位】：大连海事大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D922.294
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前9条
1 ;关于索赔问题的信函往来[J];建筑;1994年03期
2 欧阳雪梅;关于抗战胜利后国民党政府对日索赔问题[J];湘潭大学学报(哲学社会科学版);1995年04期
3 ;您会处理公路建设中的索赔问题吗?[J];公路运输文摘;2001年03期
4 郭鸿儒;乔月宾;;地震引起的建设工程索赔问题研究[J];水电站设计;2011年04期
5 李合新;关于种子索赔问题的思考[J];种子科技;2002年02期
6 费令婕;易货贸易索赔问题初探[J];经营与管理;1995年10期
7 栾致锁;水电工程施工中的索赔问题[J];陕西水利;2000年02期
8 王安;;把黄老汉架起来烤[J];廉政w，
本文编号：2242615
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/jingjifalunwen/2242615.html
