公司代表权的控制

发布时间：2018-10-07 19:55

【摘要】：伴随我国实体经济规模的不断扩大,市场经济主体的制度建设逐步推进,法人组织在目前来看无论选择上市还是新三板挂牌,都对法人组织本身的分权自治、组织机构等制度的完善程度有很高的要求的,大多数国企改制都已经结束,现代公司治理模式都已较为完善,但是很多法人组织虽然机构完善,经营过程中却无法阻止法定代表人的权利滥用。由于我国市场经济的历程较短,改革初期公司法律制度以牺牲企业的自治权力来保全交易安全和第三人的信赖利益,大多数的市场主体不能自主决定代表人,只能由法律来决定,这样不能满足实体经济规模上升的要求,更无法有效控制法人代表的权力滥用。本文在法人代表对公司的控制权争夺的侧面展开,对应对策略进行浅析。国外有关的经验为我国法定代表权的争夺与代表职权滥用提供了有力的借鉴,我们不仅要促使法定代表人合法合章程规定的去对外行使法人的意思表示,还要在一定情况下限制法定代表人手里的公司控制权。这是我国代表权模式是法定唯一性决定的。那么法定代表人的僵化性所带来的高度集权的弊端是本文探讨的。虽然一方面在特殊的历史背景下很多大中型企业、家族企业、集体企业都是不具有民主自治传统的,集权可以对抗风险,决策重大公司事务,以致企业听命于一人,受控于一方的现象已是由来已久了。建设和发展企业自治和民主的目的是不能于一朝一夕之间达成的。这要求公司的代表主体一定要做到合规的执行公司的意思表示,保证公司利益最大化,通过完善公司自治设置相关机构,监督代表权的产生和使用。
[Abstract]:With the continuous expansion of the real economy scale in our country, the system construction of the main body of the market economy is advancing step by step. At present, no matter whether the legal person organization chooses to go on the market or the new three boards are listed, it will be decentralized and autonomous to the legal person organization itself. The degree of perfection of such systems as organization and organization is very high. Most of the state-owned enterprises' reform has ended, and the modern corporate governance model has been relatively perfect. However, although many legal organizations are well organized, In the course of operation, however, the abuse of the rights of the legal representative cannot be prevented. Because of the short history of market economy in our country, in the early stage of the reform, the company legal system protected the transaction safety and the trust benefit of the third party by sacrificing the autonomous power of the enterprise, and most of the market subjects could not decide the representative on their own. It can only be decided by law, which can not meet the demand of increasing the scale of real economy, and can not effectively control the abuse of power of legal representative. In this paper, the legal representative of the company's control of the side of the fight for the analysis of the response strategy. The relevant foreign experience has provided a powerful reference for the struggle for legal representation and the abuse of the representative's power in China. We should not only urge the legal representative to exercise the intention of a foreign legal person in accordance with the provisions of the articles of association. But also in certain circumstances to limit the legal representative in the hands of the control of the company. This is our country's representation model is legal uniqueness decision. So the legal representative's inflexibility brings the high centralization malpractice is discussed in this article. Although on the one hand, many large and medium-sized enterprises, family enterprises, and collective enterprises do not have a tradition of democratic autonomy under a special historical background, centralization can counter risks and make decisions on major corporate affairs, so that enterprises are ordered by one person. The phenomenon of being controlled by one side has been around for a long time. The goal of building and developing enterprise autonomy and democracy cannot be achieved overnight. This requires that the representative subject of the company must perform the expression of intention of the company in compliance, ensure the maximization of the company's interests, and supervise the generation and use of the representation by perfecting the company's autonomy and setting up relevant institutions.
【学位授予单位】：吉林财经大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2017
【分类号】：D922.291.91

【相似文献】