分期付款买卖之所有权保留的法律适用问题研究

发布时间：2018-10-08 11:03

【摘要】：分期付款买卖之所有权保留制度是经过时间的过滤沉淀下来能够适用市场经济与社会需求的产物。这个制度经过大量实践与时间的打磨已经得到了市场的广泛认可,其能够很好地顾及到双方当事人与善意第三人,使其利益不致于遭受到损害,不但如此,其最大的优点还在于能够顾及到交易的安全性与交易的效率性。总而言之,此制度是能够得到市场的认同并不断完善其出现了不足之处,是值得去继续研究的制度。对所有权保留制度的研究在理论方面的研究成果比比皆是,但笔者还是想再去班门弄斧地去探析此制度的深奥之处。随着经济的发展,人们消费理念的转念以及交易的增多,使得该制度在司法实践中出现了诸多需要解决的问题。法律的滞后性与解决问题紧迫性之间的矛盾,推定了新的法律条文的出现。在新的《买卖合同司法解释》出台这一契机的推动下,所有权买卖在市场的应用过程中,应该会出现与以往不同的新气象。因为新的法律条文的出现,必定会对司法实践问题的解决起到新的指导作用,而且在颁行后的近期一段时间也是考验法律是否与国情相适应的攻坚时期,可以在这一阶段进行相关法律适用中的问题的收集,以此可以为后期再次进行新的司法解释提供现实方面的实践问题依据。《买卖合同司法解释》虽然解决了一些现实中出现的具体问题,但法律本身特有的滞后性的特征,使其仍然会继续出现不足的漏洞。比如,此次的法律规定中关于所有权保留制度在其内部效力和外部效力方面仍有许多需要进一步细化和明确的地方,另外,该司法解释对所有权保留适用范围的限制也过于严格,在所有权保留方面的有关登记与否的具体法律导向也未涉及到。这些种种的原因都是我们需要对其进行研究的推动力,因此可以说其法律适用问题是需要进一步探讨的,这也是这篇文章笔者之所以进行探讨的原因所在。本文旨在通过该最新的司法解释对分期付款买卖之所有权保留制度的法律适用问题进行探析,并在对其进行解读和分析的基础上,提出了相关的完善建议,使得分期付款买卖之所有权保留制度能够更好的与我国市场相融合。本文主要通过四部分对所有权保留的法律适用问题进行探析,第一部分先对分期付款买卖之所有权保利制度的相关概念进行介绍,为后面的法律适用问题的分析做好基础理论上的铺垫。第二部分通过实例对所有权保留制度的法律适用进行分析,找出司法实践中出现的一些焦点问题,并对当事人相关的所有权保留制度法律适用中的焦点问题进行阐述。第三部分对所有权保留制度的法律适用问题中的范围及法律效力问题这两部分进行具体探讨。第四部分是根据第三部分的具体问题提出一些相应的完善建议。
[Abstract]:The retention of ownership system is the product of market economy and social demand. This system, which has been widely accepted by the market after a great deal of practice and time grinding, has been able to take good account of both parties and bona fide third parties, so that their interests will not be harmed, and more so, Its biggest advantage also lies in the ability to take into account the transaction security and trading efficiency. In a word, this system is the one that can be recognized by the market and perfected continuously, which is worthy of further study. The research on the retention of title system is full of achievements in theory, but the author still wants to explore the profound aspects of the system. With the development of economy, the change of people's consumption idea and the increase of transaction, there are many problems that need to be solved in the judicial practice. The contradiction between the lag of law and the urgency of solving the problem presumes the emergence of new legal provisions. Under the impetus of the introduction of the new "Judicial interpretation of the contract of purchase and Exchange", there should be a new situation different from the previous one in the application of ownership trading in the market. Because the emergence of new legal provisions will certainly play a new guiding role in solving the problems in judicial practice, and the recent period after enactment will also be a critical period to test whether the law is suitable for the national conditions. The collection of issues in the application of relevant laws can be carried out at this stage, In this way, it can provide practical basis for the new judicial interpretation in the later period. Although the judicial interpretation of the contract of sale has solved some specific problems in reality, the law itself has the characteristic of lag. Make it still will continue to appear insufficient loophole. For example, there are still many areas in the current legal provisions concerning the internal and external effects of the retention of title regime that need to be further refined and clarified, in addition, The judicial interpretation limits the scope of application of retention of title too strictly, and the specific legal guidance on registration or not in respect of retention of title is not covered. All these reasons are the driving force that we need to study, so we can say that the application of the law needs to be further explored, which is the reason why the author of this article. The purpose of this paper is to analyze the legal application of the retention of title system of installment purchase and sale through the latest judicial interpretation, and on the basis of its interpretation and analysis, the author puts forward some suggestions to improve it. So that the retention of ownership system of installment purchase and sale can better integrate with the market of our country. This paper mainly analyzes the application of the law of retention of title in four parts. The first part introduces the related concepts of the system of interest of ownership in installment purchase and sale. For the subsequent analysis of the application of the law to do a good job in basic theory. In the second part, the author analyzes the legal application of the retention of title system through examples, finds out some focus problems in judicial practice, and expounds the focus issues in the legal application of the ownership retention system related to the parties. The third part discusses the scope and legal effect of the legal application of the retention of title system. The fourth part is according to the third part of the specific problems put forward some corresponding suggestions.
【学位授予单位】：华中科技大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：D922.28;D923.6

【参考文献】