我国清理股市场外配资的法律研究
[Abstract]:In 2015, China's stock market had a huge volatility, in which the OTC allocation business played a role in contributing, and even triggered a precipitous fall in the stock market to a certain extent. The over-the-counter allocation business of stock market is produced in recent years, and it is a kind of unique phenomenon of our country. The concept of over-the-counter allocation in stock market studied in this paper is narrow. OTC allocation refers to companies engaged in matching business, combining with modern Internet information technology, using securities trading channels and other factors. It forms the over-the-counter capital allocation mode of the securities account trading sub-position system. The development of OTC investment business has caused confusion in China's stock market to a certain extent. After analyzing the pros and cons of OTC allocation business, we draw lessons from the experience and lessons of OTC allocation business causing large volatility of stock market. In the process of stock market development, it is necessary to strengthen the legal regulation of over-the-counter allocation business and put forward relevant suggestions to promote the healthy development of China's stock market, which is conducive to the stability of China's capital market. It is divided into four parts: the first part introduces the legal definition of OTC allocation in stock market. First of all, it analyzes the legal connotation of the over-the-counter allocation in the stock market, which refers to the provision of financial services for securities trading without obtaining the relevant administrative permission. The service of providing funds for stocks or futures beyond the scope prescribed by law. Secondly, it introduces the legal attributes of over-the-counter allocation activities, and points out three different views, namely, the legal relationship of private lending, the legal relationship of entrustment and handling as an anonymous contract. OTC allocation of funds in stock market is a kind of private lending relationship, and in judicial practice, it is also dealt with according to the legal relationship of private lending. The second part points out the main problems of over-the-market allocation in Chinese stock market. First of all, it describes the path of the generation and development of OTC allocation in China, and analyzes the existing problems of OTC allocation in the stock market. Through the analysis of the existing problems, it lays a foundation for the following legal suggestions. Finally, the author collected and sorted out the practical measures to clean up the over-the-counter allocation of capital in the stock market in the past period, especially in the period of stock disaster. In the third part, the author gives a general description of the practice of clearing up the over-the-counter allocation of the stock market in China, and makes a simple analysis of the practice of clearing up the allocation, which provides a reference for the following legal countermeasures. The fourth part, through the legal definition of over-the-counter allocation behavior, combined with foreign advanced experience in the field of securities, according to the actual situation of our country and the characteristics of over-the-counter allocation, according to the over-the-counter allocation behavior of our country, put forward some suggestions to perfect the laws and regulations. Furthermore, it is clear that the main body of securities management should be prohibited from engaging in over-the-counter allocation, strengthen risk supervision, and establish an early warning and supervision mechanism for over-the-counter allocation of capital in the stock market. In addition, in the aspect of legal remedy, some suggestions are put forward to construct the evidence collection mechanism of OTC allocation. It can guide and restrict the over-the-counter allocation behavior of our country so as to make it develop healthily and help the development of China's securities market.
【学位授予单位】:海南大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:D922.287
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 欧广远;非法传销的法律界定及规制[J];学习月刊;2004年11期
2 涂富秀;;论我国行业协会功能的法律界定[J];福建金融管理干部学院学报;2009年03期
3 纪文华;;间接持有证券的权益性质及法律界定[J];金融法苑;2003年03期
4 许利平;;“公共利益”无需法律界定[J];辽宁行政学院学报;2010年08期
5 鲍瑞玲;;我国中小企业的法律界定[J];沿海企业与科技;2012年06期
6 费锦红;我国中小企业划分标准的法律界定[J];嘉兴学院学报;2003年01期
7 周方;;传统知识的法律界定[J];情报杂志;2005年12期
8 黄莉萍;徐建敏;;伪劣产品之法律界定[J];学习月刊;2006年22期
9 陆佳;;公共利益法律界定的比较研究[J];法制与社会;2007年12期
10 胡鸿高;;论公共利益的法律界定——从要素解释的路径[J];中国法学;2008年04期
相关会议论文 前4条
1 常娟;李艳翎;;论体育冠名权及其法律界定[A];第七届全国体育科学大会论文摘要汇编(一)[C];2004年
2 姜明安;;关于法律界定“公共利益”含义和范围的必要性和可能性的对话[A];修宪之后的中国行政法——中国法学会行政法学研究会2004年年会论文集[C];2004年
3 马绪超;;档案管理和利用权属的法律界定[A];中国档案学会第六次全国档案学术讨论会论文集[C];2002年
4 胡鸿高;王东光;倪蓉;丁仪;王维达;陈荣根;王青;朱倩;杨卓敏;;公共利益的法律界定与实务研究[A];2007年政府法制研究[C];2007年
相关重要报纸文章 前4条
1 本报记者 王晓雁;“农村集体经济组织”需法律界定[N];法制日报;2014年
2 高志明;商业贿赂的法律界定[N];中国审计报;2007年
3 胡鸿高 复旦大学民商法研究中心主任 教授;公共利益的法律界定[N];中国纪检监察报;2009年
4 张红霞;“剽窃”与“抄袭”的法律界定[N];人民邮电;2002年
相关博士学位论文 前1条
1 范振国;公共利益的法律界定与限制研究[D];吉林大学;2010年
相关硕士学位论文 前5条
1 张祚;我国清理股市场外配资的法律研究[D];海南大学;2017年
2 章秋琼;论中小企业的法律界定[D];对外经济贸易大学;2006年
3 罗卫华;公共利益及其法律界定问题研究[D];河北师范大学;2011年
4 高鹏;论城市房屋征收中公共利益的法律界定[D];中共中央党校;2010年
5 赵莹;促进我国中小企业发展的法律对策研究[D];吉林财经大学;2014年
,本文编号:2274405
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/jingjifalunwen/2274405.html