指导案例制度的功能及其限度——以指导案例8号的引用情况为分析样本
发布时间：2018-10-16 16:00
【摘要】：对指导案例制度的研究,目前应转入对单个指导案例实际运行情况进行追踪式的研究进路。本文是该研究转向的一个尝试,以指导案例8号为分析样本。对其引用情况的数据统计与分析表明,其引用状况较为"低劣",远未实现最高院所预期的"指导功能"。以此为基础,本文对指导案例制度的功能予以反思,指出其限度所在,认为在实现"同案同判"的宏旨上,一方面对其不应抱持过高的预期,另一方面又有相当的可作为空间。
[Abstract]:At present, the research of guiding case system should be turned to the research approach of tracing the actual operation of a single guiding case. This paper is an attempt to guide case 8 as an analysis sample. The statistics and analysis of the citation data show that the quoting condition is inferior and far from realizing the "guiding function" expected by the Supreme Court. On the basis of this, this paper reflects on the function of guiding case system, points out its limitation, and holds that, on the one hand, it should not be expected too high, on the other hand, it can be regarded as space.
【作者单位】： 北京大学法学院;
【分类号】：D922.291.91
，
本文编号：2274873
[Abstract]:At present, the research of guiding case system should be turned to the research approach of tracing the actual operation of a single guiding case. This paper is an attempt to guide case 8 as an analysis sample. The statistics and analysis of the citation data show that the quoting condition is inferior and far from realizing the "guiding function" expected by the Supreme Court. On the basis of this, this paper reflects on the function of guiding case system, points out its limitation, and holds that, on the one hand, it should not be expected too high, on the other hand, it can be regarded as space.
【作者单位】： 北京大学法学院;
【分类号】：D922.291.91
，
本文编号：2274873
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/jingjifalunwen/2274873.html
