基金会享受税收优惠的体制重建研究
[Abstract]:There are four regulatory documents regulating how foundations qualify for tax benefits, which are not entirely appropriate and need reform. In fundamental principle, should change from pluralistic system to unified "compulsory identity system". With regard to the substantive conditions for obtaining the eligibility for tax concessions, it should be revised as follows: the Foundation has been legally registered; the Foundation is mainly engaged in public welfare undertakings within the territory of China; and the Foundation shall not directly or indirectly provide donors or organizations, Full-time staff shall distribute property free of charge; the Foundation shall distribute property in accordance with article 29, paragraph 1, of the regulations of the Foundation; and the Foundation shall distribute the remaining property after write-off in accordance with article 33 of the regulations of the Foundation. In the process of obtaining the qualification of tax preference, the following contents should be perfected: the foundation should apply for the qualification of tax preference immediately after the establishment and registration; the applicant only need to submit the following materials: application, certificate of registration, articles of association; The competent authority shall, within a certain period of time, decide whether to grant the eligibility for tax preference; if the grant is refused, the reasons shall be provided in writing; and the applicant may apply for administrative review of the decision not granted. In the term of validity of the tax concession qualification, it should be changed to permanent validity. The following contents should be perfected: the foundation must submit to the tax authorities on a regular basis the information on the substantive conditions of obtaining the qualification of tax preference; If the Foundation commits an illegal act in respect of submitting information in violation of the substantive conditions for obtaining tax concessions, a fine shall be imposed on the management of the Foundation and other persons involved in the violation; if the circumstances are serious or the consequences are bad, The manager shall be dismissed. Legislation should also ensure the coordination between tax supervision and internal supervision, the supervision of registration and management authorities, and the supervision of accounting.
【作者单位】: 浙江工商大学法学院;中国社会科学院法学研究所;
【基金】:浙江工商大学法学基地项目“基金会税务监督制度研究”(2014A003)的最终研究成果
【分类号】:D922.22
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前1条
1 李林木;美国国内收入局审计选案系统的发展述评[J];税务研究;2004年09期
【共引文献】
相关期刊论文 前2条
1 袁冰;李建军;;美国的税收征管制度及其启示[J];公共经济与政策研究;2015年01期
2 金鹏;蔡淑琴;;纳税评估信息系统对税收遵从的影响模型[J];情报杂志;2008年12期
相关博士学位论文 前5条
1 胡建民;我国税收征管问题研究[D];华中科技大学;2011年
2 李鹏飞;纳税评估问题研究[D];东北财经大学;2011年
3 周广仁;中国税收征管能力问题研究[D];南京农业大学;2006年
4 金鹏;基于网络中介信息的电子商务税收遵从与征管研究[D];华中科技大学;2009年
5 钟鸣明;偷逃税的防范研究[D];江西财经大学;2009年
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 李永强;基于体系重构的税务稽查效率研究[D];南京理工大学;2011年
2 郭君明;基层国税征管能力建设研究[D];南昌大学;2011年
3 王蕾;从提高税收遵从度的视角探讨税收征管的优化[D];贵州财经学院;2011年
4 王皓妍;纳税信用等级制度指标体系的完善[D];南京财经大学;2011年
5 吕春生;偷税行为:博弈分析与治理路径[D];厦门大学;2005年
6 黄海;纳税信用风险度量实证研究[D];厦门大学;2006年
7 王久铱;基于聚类的税务稽查选案方法及其系统的研究[D];大连理工大学;2007年
8 高升;税务检查对纳税遵从的影响研究[D];东北财经大学;2007年
9 张丽丽;我国纳税评估制度存在的若干问题及其对策研究[D];中国人民大学;2008年
10 孙继生;我国私营企业纳税筹划相关问题研究[D];天津大学;2009年
【二级参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前3条
1 河南省国税局赴美考察团;美国现行税制一瞥——河南国税赴美考察团考察报告[J];河南税务;1998年12期
2 刘尊涛,孔雪梅;计算机在美国税收征管中的应用及启示[J];涉外税务;2002年10期
3 梁俊娇 ,张毅生;美国个人所得税的申报、征收和稽核制度[J];中国税务;2002年01期
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前1条
1 李h,
本文编号:2287588
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/jingjifalunwen/2287588.html