美国反垄断法规制忠实折扣标准对我国的启示
发布时间：2018-11-03 19:13
【摘要】：美国反垄断法判断忠实折扣竞争效果没有统一标准,有的法院将其类推为排他性交易,有的法院将其类推为掠夺性定价。排他性交易与掠夺性定价的适用规则各有自身缺陷。排他性交易可能产生积极错误,将具有效率行为认定为非法,同时该标准不具有规则的确定性和预期性。掠夺性定价可能产生消极错误,开脱某些非法竞争行为。无论将忠实折扣类推为排他性交易还是掠夺性定价,均无法避免上述弊端。根据类推的基准行为和目标行为应具有的结构类似性以及两种缺陷的大小,以类推适用掠夺性定价的规则较为适宜。
[Abstract]:There is no uniform standard to judge the competitive effect of loyalty discount in American antimonopoly law. Some courts regard it as exclusive transaction, and others judge it as predatory pricing. The applicable rules of exclusive transaction and predatory pricing have their own defects. Exclusionary transactions may lead to positive errors, which make efficient behavior illegal, and this standard does not have the certainty and expectation of rules. Predatory pricing can lead to negative errors that excuse some illegal competition. These disadvantages cannot be avoided by analogy of loyalty discounts to exclusive transactions or predatory pricing. According to the structural similarity between the benchmark behavior and the target behavior and the size of the two defects, it is more appropriate to apply the rules of predatory pricing by analogy.
【作者单位】： 宜春学院政法学院;
【分类号】：D971.2;DD912.29
本文编号：2308720
[Abstract]:There is no uniform standard to judge the competitive effect of loyalty discount in American antimonopoly law. Some courts regard it as exclusive transaction, and others judge it as predatory pricing. The applicable rules of exclusive transaction and predatory pricing have their own defects. Exclusionary transactions may lead to positive errors, which make efficient behavior illegal, and this standard does not have the certainty and expectation of rules. Predatory pricing can lead to negative errors that excuse some illegal competition. These disadvantages cannot be avoided by analogy of loyalty discounts to exclusive transactions or predatory pricing. According to the structural similarity between the benchmark behavior and the target behavior and the size of the two defects, it is more appropriate to apply the rules of predatory pricing by analogy.
【作者单位】： 宜春学院政法学院;
【分类号】：D971.2;DD912.29
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前3条
1 肖丹颖;;论美国掠夺性定价的法律要件[J];科技创业月刊;2006年09期
2 王传辉,赵敏燕;美国软件业掠夺性定价与不正当竞争行为认定[J];政治与法律;2002年02期
3 姜栋;;论美国反倾销法的掠夺性定价理论[J];东方论坛(青岛大学学报);2006年06期
相关重要报纸文章 前1条
1 韦恩·克鲁斯邋阿尔伯特·明加迪;欧盟重罚微软 不值得喝彩[N];第一财经日报;2007年
相关硕士学位论文 前1条
1 刘源;美国反垄断中的掠夺性定价问题研究[D];湖南大学;2011年
，本文编号：2308720
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/jingjifalunwen/2308720.html
