网约车地方立法问题研究
发布时间：2018-11-17 07:05
【摘要】：网约车行业近几年发展迅猛,随着网约车发展,网约车慢慢步入正轨。中央根据公众出行的实际需要,于2016年出台《网络预约出租汽车经营服务管理暂行办法》,确认了网约车的合法地位。但是作为部门规章,以新设行政许可方式管理网约车,其法律效力存疑。随后,各地响应中央的号召,相继出台了地方网约车实施细则。然而,实践中大部分城市并不属于真正意义上的网约车地方立法,仅是以规范性文件的形式进行规制。地方网约车立法中存在诸多问题:作为立法权源的《网络预约出租汽车管理服务暂行办法》,本身存在效力瑕疵,难以成为地方网约车立法适格的授权主体;地方城市政府制定的网约车实施细则存在违反上位法、程序不合理的情形,以青岛市为例,在必要的时候,政府可以实行指导价,不符合《价格法》的规定;增加行政许可条件,则违反了《行政许可法》的原则,限制户籍车籍,难以通过公平审查制度。为纠正网约车地方立法存在的问题,保障网约车地方立法合法性,可以从现有法律体系内外两条途径解决,一方面对违法的网约车实施细则通过备案审查程序和公平审查制度进行纠正;另一方面,赋予设区的市政府以临时行政许可创设权,增大城市政府的立法权限,顺应城市管理的需要。
[Abstract]:In recent years, the net car-hailing industry has developed rapidly, with the development of the net car-hailing industry, the net car-hailing industry is slowly on the right track. According to the actual needs of public travel, the central government issued the interim measures for the Management of online booking Taxi Business Service in 2016, confirming the legal status of online taxi booking. However, as a department regulation, the new administrative license to manage the net car, its legal effect is doubtful. Subsequently, in response to the call of the central government, local network car-sharing implementation rules have been issued. However, in practice, most cities do not belong to the real sense of the local legislation, only in the form of normative documents to regulate. There are many problems in the legislation of local network ride-hailing: as the source of legislative power, the "temporary method of booking Taxi Management Service", which is the source of legislative power, has its own defects in its own effectiveness, and it is difficult to become the authorized subject of the local network ride-sharing legislation; The local city government formulates the net charter car implementation rule to have the violation upper position law, the procedure unreasonable situation, takes the Qingdao city as an example, when necessary, the government may carry out the guide price, does not conform to the "price law" stipulation; Adding the condition of administrative license violates the principle of "Administrative license Law", limits the registration of household registration, and is difficult to pass the system of fair examination. In order to correct the problems existing in the local legislation, and to guarantee the legality of the local legislation, it can be solved through two ways, inside and outside the existing legal system. On the one hand, the implementation rules of illegal network car through the record review procedures and fair review system to correct; On the other hand, the district government is given the right to create temporary administrative license, to increase the legislative authority of the city government and to meet the needs of urban management.
【学位授予单位】：烟台大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2018
【分类号】：D922.296
本文编号：2336895
[Abstract]:In recent years, the net car-hailing industry has developed rapidly, with the development of the net car-hailing industry, the net car-hailing industry is slowly on the right track. According to the actual needs of public travel, the central government issued the interim measures for the Management of online booking Taxi Business Service in 2016, confirming the legal status of online taxi booking. However, as a department regulation, the new administrative license to manage the net car, its legal effect is doubtful. Subsequently, in response to the call of the central government, local network car-sharing implementation rules have been issued. However, in practice, most cities do not belong to the real sense of the local legislation, only in the form of normative documents to regulate. There are many problems in the legislation of local network ride-hailing: as the source of legislative power, the "temporary method of booking Taxi Management Service", which is the source of legislative power, has its own defects in its own effectiveness, and it is difficult to become the authorized subject of the local network ride-sharing legislation; The local city government formulates the net charter car implementation rule to have the violation upper position law, the procedure unreasonable situation, takes the Qingdao city as an example, when necessary, the government may carry out the guide price, does not conform to the "price law" stipulation; Adding the condition of administrative license violates the principle of "Administrative license Law", limits the registration of household registration, and is difficult to pass the system of fair examination. In order to correct the problems existing in the local legislation, and to guarantee the legality of the local legislation, it can be solved through two ways, inside and outside the existing legal system. On the one hand, the implementation rules of illegal network car through the record review procedures and fair review system to correct; On the other hand, the district government is given the right to create temporary administrative license, to increase the legislative authority of the city government and to meet the needs of urban management.
【学位授予单位】：烟台大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2018
【分类号】：D922.296
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 施立栋;;波斯纳法官谈网约车的规制——伊利诺伊州运输贸易协会诉芝加哥市案[J];苏州大学学报(法学版);2017年04期
2 崔衍超;;新政实施后网约车企业发展现状及面临问题——以滴滴为例[J];交通与港航;2017年05期
3 孙琳;;有限政府理论视角下网约车地方立法路径探析[J];武汉交通职业学院学报;2017年03期
4 郑毅;;中央与地方立法权关系视角下的网约车立法——基于《立法法》与《行政许可法》的分析[J];当代法学;2017年02期
5 侯登华;;共享经济下网络平台的法律地位——以网约车为研究对象[J];政法论坛;2017年01期
6 周易茗;;网约车新政出台之监管思考[J];湖南行政学院学报;2017年01期
7 侯登华;;“四方协议”下网约车的运营模式及其监管路径[J];法学杂志;2016年12期
8 张效羽;;网约车地方立法若干法律问题研究[J];行政与法;2016年10期
9 梅健;;中国网约车的规制范式研究[J];中国市场;2016年36期
10 修青华;;行政许可规制的转变与创新——以网约车为例[J];法大研究生;2016年01期
，本文编号：2336895
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/jingjifalunwen/2336895.html
