垄断语境下标准必要专利许可费之厘定——兼评“高通案”专利许可费的裁决
发布时间：2018-11-21 09:20
【摘要】：标准必要专利具有双重属性:一方面为激励创新而具有私人独占属性,另一方面因纳入标准而具有强烈的社会公共利益属性。在社会分工不断深化的背景下,标准必要专利的公共利益属性日益凸显。"FRAND原则"建立在专利权人本位立场之上,对专利权滥用的规制存在天然不足。标准必要专利许可费应当采取分类规制原则,将"明显低于正常许可费"作为基本目标,实现标准必要专利许可费厘定方法新的路径。"高通案"对许可费的确定已经体现出标准必要专利的公共利益属性,但仍存在可以改进的空间。
[Abstract]:The essential patent of standard has double attributes: on the one hand, it has private exclusive attribute to encourage innovation, on the other hand, it has strong attribute of social public interest because it is included in the standard. Under the background of deepening social division of labor, the public interest attribute of standard essential patent is increasingly prominent. "FRAND principle" is based on the patentee standard, and the regulation of patent abuse is naturally inadequate. The standard essential patent license fee should adopt the classification regulation principle, take "obviously lower than the normal license fee" as the basic goal, realizes the standard essential patent license fee determination method new path. Qualcomm's determination of the license fee has reflected the public interest attribute of the standard necessary patent, but there is still room for improvement.
【作者单位】： 西南政法大学;
【基金】：重庆市研究生科研创新项目(项目编号CYB14069)
【分类号】：D912.29
本文编号：2346544
[Abstract]:The essential patent of standard has double attributes: on the one hand, it has private exclusive attribute to encourage innovation, on the other hand, it has strong attribute of social public interest because it is included in the standard. Under the background of deepening social division of labor, the public interest attribute of standard essential patent is increasingly prominent. "FRAND principle" is based on the patentee standard, and the regulation of patent abuse is naturally inadequate. The standard essential patent license fee should adopt the classification regulation principle, take "obviously lower than the normal license fee" as the basic goal, realizes the standard essential patent license fee determination method new path. Qualcomm's determination of the license fee has reflected the public interest attribute of the standard necessary patent, but there is still room for improvement.
【作者单位】： 西南政法大学;
【基金】：重庆市研究生科研创新项目(项目编号CYB14069)
【分类号】：D912.29
【相似文献】
相关期刊论文 前4条
1 ;动态[J];电子知识产权;2014年06期
2 ;国外简讯[J];电子知识产权;2010年01期
3 邹声泠;;25%规则在确定专利许可费中的应用[J];经济视角(中旬);2011年03期
4 ;[J];;年期
相关重要报纸文章 前6条
1 ;无线通信业巨头联手[N];人民邮电;2008年
2 本报记者 王康 实习记者 陈景秋;微软三星：没有朋友只有利益？[N];中国知识产权报;2014年
3 ;正确处理专利许可费用[N];中国经营报;2005年
4 王雷 国家知识产权局知识产权发展研究中心副研究员;WAPI标准须加快脚步[N];通信产业报;2011年
5 北京商报记者 韩哲;IDC称不再就专利许可费漫天要价[N];北京商报;2014年
6 本报记者 李响;BDA首次接纳中国技术[N];计算机世界;2009年
，本文编号：2346544
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/jingjifalunwen/2346544.html
