域外反垄断自由酌处权的考察与借鉴
发布时间：2018-11-25 07:39
【摘要】：我国反垄断执法体系从上至下叠床架屋形成了商务部、国家工商总局、国家发改委和省市县各级机构林立的执法权配置结构。不统一的考量因素和非细化的裁量标准导致现实中反垄断处罚金额起点与上限畸轻畸重。欧盟处理微软垄断案和美国处理微软垄断案分别确立了反垄断处罚的若干考量因素和限制性适用条件。我国反垄断法第49条的规定过于笼统和抽象,需要细化:统一行使自由酌处权的执法机构;区别有效率和无效率两类垄断而分别确定其处罚的轻重;制定有梯度的处罚金额幅度,形成法律的激励导向。
[Abstract]:From top to bottom, China's anti-monopoly law enforcement system has formed the configuration structure of the law enforcement power of the Ministry of Commerce, the State Administration of Industry and Commerce, the State Development and Reform Commission and the provincial, municipal and county agencies at all levels. Different consideration factors and non-detailed discretion standard lead to the abnormal starting point and upper limit of antitrust penalty amount in reality. The European Union deals with the Microsoft monopoly case and the United States deals with the Microsoft monopoly case, which respectively establishes some considerations and restrictive applicable conditions for antitrust punishment. The provisions of Article 49 of China's Anti-monopoly Law are too general and abstract and need to be refined: unified law enforcement agencies exercising discretionary power, distinguishing between efficient and inefficient monopolies and determining the severity of punishment respectively; Establish a gradient of the amount of punishment, to form a legal incentive guidance.
【作者单位】： 广东金融学院法律系;
【基金】：教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目“公用事业公私合作法律促进机制研究”(项目编号:12YJ C820018) 广东省知识产权局软科学项目“广东省创新型企业专利商用服务平台构建研究”(项目编号:GDI P2014-G01)阶段性成果
【分类号】：D922.294;D912.29
[Abstract]:From top to bottom, China's anti-monopoly law enforcement system has formed the configuration structure of the law enforcement power of the Ministry of Commerce, the State Administration of Industry and Commerce, the State Development and Reform Commission and the provincial, municipal and county agencies at all levels. Different consideration factors and non-detailed discretion standard lead to the abnormal starting point and upper limit of antitrust penalty amount in reality. The European Union deals with the Microsoft monopoly case and the United States deals with the Microsoft monopoly case, which respectively establishes some considerations and restrictive applicable conditions for antitrust punishment. The provisions of Article 49 of China's Anti-monopoly Law are too general and abstract and need to be refined: unified law enforcement agencies exercising discretionary power, distinguishing between efficient and inefficient monopolies and determining the severity of punishment respectively; Establish a gradient of the amount of punishment, to form a legal incentive guidance.
【作者单位】： 广东金融学院法律系;
【基金】：教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目“公用事业公私合作法律促进机制研究”(项目编号:12YJ C820018) 广东省知识产权局软科学项目“广东省创新型企业专利商用服务平台构建研究”(项目编号:GDI P2014-G01)阶段性成果
【分类号】：D922.294;D912.29
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前1条
1 章彦英;解志勇;;我国反垄断执法机构设置问题研究——以美国、德国为参照[J];国家行政学院学报;2008年02期
【共引文献】
相关期刊论文 前3条
1 张骏;;我国《反垄断法》对于纵向垄断协议的法律规制研究——以《反垄断法》第14、15条为中心[J];河北科技大学学报(社会科学版);2012年04期
2 王宵兰;;整体主义视域中的行政垄断规制——兼论对《反垄断法》的反思[J];商业时代;2012年32期
3 许鹭嘉;;我国反垄断执法机构革新探析[J];学术探索;2013年03期
相关博士学位论文 前1条
1 张骏;论美国纵向限制法律规范及其对我国的启示[D];华东政法大学;2010年
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 黄颖慧;南非竞争执法体制研究[D];华东政法大学;2010年
2 楼春晗;巴西反垄断法实施体制研究[D];华东政法大学;2010年
3 张琦;拒绝交易的反垄断法规制[D];山西财经大学;2011年
4 黄t燊，
本文编号：2355324
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/jingjifalunwen/2355324.html
