保险人免责条款说明义务研究
[Abstract]:The 17 th article of insurance law of our country has two layer meaning, one is about form clause: explain to policy-holder content. The second is about exemption clause: the prompt that causes policy-holder attention, still want to make clear explanation. In judicial practice, explicit explanation and prompt obligation have become the focus of dispute in insurance contract litigation cases. On the basis of the fact that the insurer failed to perform the obligation of explicit explanation and the act of prohibiting the law to perform the obligation of presentation to the policy holder, the court ruled that the exemption clause was not effective for the insurance company. Therefore, from the various cases in judicial practice, combined with the problems in judicial practice, this paper analyzes the problems existing in the insurer's explanation of obligations on exemption clauses, puts forward personal opinions, and promotes the development and improvement of the insurance system. And give trial practice a little thought. Based on the thinking of the above problems and the feelings in the trial practice, the author tries to put forward some perfect suggestions through a great deal of data arrangement and the analysis of the cases in the trial practice. This article is divided into preface, main body and conclusion, in which the main body part mainly starts from the basic situation of the insurance contract format clause to expound the basic theory of the form clause, and then leads to the insurer exemption clause explanation duty. The theoretical basis of the insurer's obligation to explain is also expounded. Secondly, through the trial practice of the relevant cases to raise questions; again to the case of legal reasoning; finally, in view of the explanation, prompt way, legal consequences, domestic and foreign system reference and so on to put forward the perfect and the suggestion.
【学位授予单位】:西北大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2015
【分类号】:D922.284
【共引文献】
相关期刊论文 前5条
1 李勇;郑晓薇;;我国人身保险利益规定之完善[J];读书文摘;2015年02期
2 苗海刚;;近因原则在保险理赔中的具体适用[J];法制与社会;2015年13期
3 李勇;郑晓薇;;我国人身保险利益规定之完善[J];湖北警官学院学报;2014年05期
4 庄加园;;基于指示交付的动产所有权移转——兼评《中华人民共和国物权法》第26条[J];法学研究;2014年03期
5 陆忠飞;缪昌进;;保险法中疑义利益解释原则与合理期待原则辨析[J];现代妇女(下旬);2014年08期
相关会议论文 前2条
1 田帆;;保险合同中特别约定的效力问题研究[A];浙江省2011年保险法学学术年会论文集[C];2011年
2 浙江六和律师事务所课题组;郑金都;;保险合同争议研究(二)[A];浙江省2011年保险法学学术年会论文集[C];2011年
相关硕士学位论文 前10条
1 刘庆志;财产保险利益的判断标准研究[D];南京大学;2011年
2 杨华;保险合同免责条款研究[D];湖南师范大学;2011年
3 李新香;论保险法危险增加通知义务[D];山东大学;2011年
4 刘伟;保险合同免责条款效力研究[D];上海交通大学;2012年
5 曲泓亮;拒绝委付法律问题研究[D];大连海事大学;2014年
6 宋莹;保证保险合同法律问题研究[D];大连海事大学;2014年
7 李国栋;我国环境污染强制责任保险制度研究[D];苏州大学;2014年
8 焦慧;我国农村寿险营销渠道研究[D];中南林业科技大学;2014年
9 张瑜;“空白期”保险责任制度研究[D];烟台大学;2014年
10 汪蕾;我国保险合同不可抗辩条款研究[D];华侨大学;2014年
,本文编号:2384566
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/jingjifalunwen/2384566.html