德国竞争法中私人诉讼制度的改革及其启示

发布时间：2018-12-21 10:12

【摘要】：长期以来,欧洲竞争法的实施主要依靠其成员国和欧盟两方面的力量共同完成。实践中,欧盟成员国各自民事诉讼程序的差异,尤其是针对反竞争行为而提起的损害赔偿诉讼程序的差异,已经不同程度地影响到欧盟竞争法的有效实施。2005年修订的德国《反限制竞争法》主要寻求与欧盟竞争法的协调和衔接,通过扩张原告主体的范围、有限适用集体诉讼、减轻原告的举证责任、限制传递抗辩等程序制度的改革,强调对本国和欧盟竞争法在民事诉讼程序中的平等适用,以便私人更好地确保欧盟竞争法的有效实施。在我国,反垄断私人诉讼一直不甚发达,需要合理借鉴德国竞争法私人诉讼制度的改革成果,探求更为优化、全面的反垄断法实施机制。
[Abstract]:For a long time, the enforcement of European competition law mainly depends on the joint efforts of its member states and the European Union. In practice, the differences in the civil procedure of the EU member States, especially the differences in the proceedings for damages brought against anti-competitive conduct, The German Anti-Constrained Competition Law, revised in 2005, mainly seeks to coordinate and link up with the EU competition law, and by expanding the scope of the plaintiff, it is limited to apply class-action. To reduce the burden of proof of plaintiff, limit the transmission of defense and other procedural system reform, emphasize the equal application of domestic and EU competition law in civil proceedings, so that private can better ensure the effective implementation of EU competition law. In China, private antitrust litigation has not been developed, so it is necessary to use the reform results of private litigation system of German competition law for reference reasonably, and to explore a more optimized and comprehensive anti-monopoly law enforcement mechanism.
【作者单位】：广东海洋大学法学院;
【基金】：广东省哲学社会科学规划项目“民事审判权运行机制改革研究”(GD14XFX12) 广东省高校优秀青年创新人才培养计划资助项目“反垄断私人诉讼制度创新研究”(2012WYM0078)的阶段性研究成果
【分类号】：D951.6;D922.294

【参考文献】