当前位置:主页 > 法律论文 > 经济法论文 >

我国P2P网络借贷主体的法律问题研究

发布时间:2019-04-02 12:21
【摘要】:我国传统的融资市场主要以银行机构为主,一方面为了保证资金的安全性,银行机构对外借贷一般会设置很高的融资标准,这些比较高的贷款发放标准导致的结果是大型企业可以不费丝毫之力就可以获得银行的贷款,但是对中小企业和个人来说由于自身的条件达不到银行的放贷标准只能望而却步;另一方面,银行需要花费大量的时间、人力、物力、财力在调查清楚中小企业的资金状况和还款能力之后才决定是否放贷。但大型企业因为其社会影响大、资金雄厚、经营规模等,银行在放贷时不需要这么大动干戈。银行严格的放贷标准与中小企业和个人对资金的需求导致了民间借贷的日益繁荣。传统的民间借贷借助迅猛发展的互联网技术开辟了新的借贷平台一网络借贷平台,p2p网络借贷由此诞生。我国的p2p网络借贷平台属于舶来品,在发展中出现与我国实际情况不相符等一系列问题:网络借贷的立法不完善;p2p网络借贷的三方主体的权利义务规定不明确;对借贷双方的保护机制不健全;准入与退出机制不完善;缺乏个人征信体系和信息披露制度;对p2p网络借贷的监管不完善。导致p2p平台出现跑路、提现困难、诈骗,在交易中损害贷款人的利益,损害借款人的信息权益,甚至引发刑事犯罪等问题层出不穷。本文针对特定的问题提出了完善建议,包括专门立法;完善互联网方面的法律;明确借贷双方的权利义务;制定准入与退出机制;加强信息披露和监管;建立个人征信体系。P2p借贷审时度势的利用了互联网技术,解决了中小企业和个人对资金的需求,实现了金融创新。从大处而言,p2p互联网借贷在经济上是实现普惠金融的主要途径之一,在政治上能够实现金融民主,其社会价值不容小觑。因此,p2p网络借贷具有很高的研究价值。
[Abstract]:The traditional financing market in China is dominated by banking institutions. On the one hand, in order to ensure the safety of funds, banks generally set very high financing standards for external lending. The result of these higher lending standards is that large enterprises can obtain bank loans without any effort, but for small and medium-sized enterprises and individuals because of their own conditions can not meet the bank lending standards can only be deterred; On the other hand, banks need to spend a lot of time, manpower, material and financial resources to determine whether to lend after investigating the financial situation and repayment capacity of small and medium-sized enterprises. But because of its large social impact, strong capital, operating scale, banks do not need to lend so much. Strict lending standards by banks and demand for funds by small and medium-sized enterprises and individuals have led to a growing boom in private lending. The traditional folk lending opened up a new lending platform-network lending platform with the help of the rapid development of Internet technology, and P2P network lending was born. The P2P network lending platform of our country is an imported product, and has appeared a series of problems in the development, such as: the legislation of the network lending is not perfect, the rights and obligations of the three parties of the P2P network lending are unclear, and the development of the P2P network lending platform is not consistent with the actual situation of our country. The protection mechanism for both parties is not perfect; the admission and withdrawal mechanism is not perfect; the personal credit collection system and information disclosure system are lacking; the supervision of P2P network lending is not perfect. Such problems as running away from P2P platform, difficulty in withdrawing cash, fraud, damaging the interests of lenders and information rights and interests of borrowers, and even causing criminal offences emerge one after another in the course of the transaction, which causes the P2P platform to run away, withdraw cash difficult and defraud. This paper puts forward some suggestions for specific problems, including special legislation, improving the law of Internet, clarifying the rights and obligations of both lenders and borrowers, establishing the mechanism of admission and withdrawal, strengthening information disclosure and supervision, and making clear the rights and obligations of both lenders and borrowers. In order to solve the demand for funds of small and medium-sized enterprises and individuals, P2p has realized financial innovation by making use of the Internet technology in order to establish a personal credit collection system. Generally speaking, P2P Internet lending is one of the main ways to realize inclusive finance in economy. It can realize financial democracy in politics, and its social value can not be underestimated. Therefore, P2P network lending has high research value.
【学位授予单位】:宁夏大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:D922.282

【参考文献】

相关期刊论文 前10条

1 沐玲;;我国P2P网络借贷主体行为之刑法评价[J];税务与经济;2016年06期

2 罗雪梅;;新《民间借贷司法解释》下的P2P网贷平台解析[J];法制与社会;2016年13期

3 申畅;;P2P网络借贷平台的运营模式及刑事法律问题探析[J];新疆警察学院学报;2016年02期

4 高宇凡;;我国P2P网络借贷的法律监管研究[J];法制博览;2016年10期

5 孙小华;;P2P网络信贷下债权转让模式的合法性探讨[J];法制与社会;2016年08期

6 侯卓;苗露强;;我国P2P网络借贷课税问题研究[J];税务与经济;2016年01期

7 唐心韵;;我国P2P网络借贷平台监管法律问题研究[J];长沙民政职业技术学院学报;2015年04期

8 何文妍;;我国P2P网络借贷平台法律性质分类探析[J];兰州教育学院学报;2015年10期

9 林蔚;;完善P2P网贷平台风险防范的法律思考[J];华南师范大学学报(社会科学版);2015年03期

10 曲斯鸣;;完善我国P2P网络借贷法律监管的路径[J];经济论坛;2015年04期

相关重要报纸文章 前4条

1 郭奎涛;;P2P网贷平台七八成将出局[N];中国企业报;2014年

2 闫瑾;;地方版P2P网贷监管雏形首现[N];北京商报;2014年

3 李研;;三P2P网站同日被“黑” 侦查量刑两大盲点[N];21世纪经济报道;2014年

4 龙昊;;P2P小额信贷模式亟需法律规范[N];中国经济时报;2011年

相关硕士学位论文 前10条

1 李玺;我国P2P网络借贷的法律监管研究[D];山东大学;2016年

2 何聪聪;我国P2P网络借贷运营模式及风险研究[D];西南民族大学;2016年

3 丁春燕;P2P网络借贷的刑法规制问题研究[D];华东政法大学;2016年

4 李仁杰;P2P网络借贷行业的法律监管问题研究[D];杭州师范大学;2016年

5 方昕;我国互联网金融的政府监管问题研究[D];南京师范大学;2015年

6 李阳月;P2P网络借贷与小额贷款公司的合作研究[D];云南财经大学;2015年

7 程佳;我国P2P网络借贷平台的法律性质与监管路径探析[D];湖南大学;2015年

8 俞燕霞;P2P网络借贷平台刑事法律问题探析[D];华东政法大学;2015年

9 刘学婷;基于互联网平台的P2P网络借贷模式研究[D];天津商业大学;2014年

10 王旭;我国P2P网络借贷规范发展研究[D];天津师范大学;2014年



本文编号:2452558

资料下载
论文发表

本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/jingjifalunwen/2452558.html


Copyright(c)文论论文网All Rights Reserved | 网站地图 |

版权申明:资料由用户8c7cb***提供,本站仅收录摘要或目录,作者需要删除请E-mail邮箱bigeng88@qq.com