网络交易平台提供商法律问题研究
发布时间：2019-04-11 18:36
【摘要】：互联网时代人们的多元化需求促使传统交易模式不断转型,通过电子信息技术建立新秩序的网络交易平台应运而生。网络交易平台是指电子商务活动中为双方或多方提供交易撮合及相关服务的信息网络系统总和,其在网络交易过程中地位十分重要。面对当前我国网络购物市场存在的商品质量、价金支付、合同条款、商品配送等不同类型的纠纷,规范网络交易秩序的相关制度急需建立。网络交易平台提供商作为连接各方交易主体的纽带,其法律地位、权利义务、责任承担等一系列法律问题也成为讨论热点。目前,对于网络交易平台提供商法律问题的相关研究仍处于摸索阶段,学者观点争议性较大且结论不一。笔者结合不同的平台模式分析平台提供商、产品(服务)提供者和消费者三方法律关系,并在此基础之上构建三方权责系统,旨在促进平台走向规范化、合理化。本文通过案例分析法、文献研究法、比较分析法等多种方法的使用,围绕网络交易平台提供商这一中心,分析了学界现存的关于平台提供商法律地位的六种学说,提出了平台提供商新型中介地位的观点；首次区分讨论了B to C和C to C模式中平台提供商与产品(服务)提供者、消费者的法律关系,结合平台购物流程,明确各阶段不同主体间的法律关系；逐一分析了平台提供商、产品(服务)提供者、消费者的权利义务范围,着重论述了平台提供商的审查注意义务；分析了平台提供商的法律责任,主要探讨民事责任中的违约责任和侵权责任,尤其是民事责任中平台提供商间接侵权责任,认为平台提供商承担商标权间接侵权责任需满足平台用户存在侵权行为,平台提供商构成教唆或者帮助,并且平台提供商须有主观过错等要件。
[Abstract]:The diversified needs of people in the Internet era promote the continuous transformation of the traditional trading mode, and the establishment of a new order network trading platform through electronic information technology emerges as the times require. Network trading platform is the summation of information network system which provides transaction matching and related services for two or more parties in e-commerce activities, and its position is very important in the process of network transaction. Facing different kinds of disputes such as the quality of goods, payment of price, terms of contract, distribution of goods and so on, the relevant system of standardizing the order of network transactions is urgently needed to be established in the current online shopping market of our country. A series of legal issues, such as legal status, rights and obligations, liability and other legal issues, have also become a hot topic in the discussion of online trading platform providers as a link between the parties to the transaction. At present, the research on the legal issues of online trading platform providers is still in the groping stage, and the scholars' views are controversial and the conclusions are not uniform. In order to promote the standardization and rationalization of the platform, the author analyzes the tripartite legal relationship among the providers, product (service) providers and consumers according to different platform models, and constructs the tripartite power and responsibility system on this basis. Through the use of many methods, such as case analysis, literature research, comparative analysis, and so on, this paper analyzes six existing theories on the legal status of platform providers in the academic circles, focusing on the center of network trading platform providers. The new intermediary position of platform provider is put forward. It is the first time to distinguish and discuss the legal relationship between platform provider, product (service) provider and consumer in B to C and C to C model. According to the shopping process of platform, the legal relationship between different subjects in each stage is clarified. This paper analyzes the scope of rights and obligations of platform providers, product (service) providers and consumers one by one, focusing on the inspection and care obligations of platform providers. This paper analyzes the legal liability of the platform provider, mainly discusses the liability for breach of contract and tort liability in the civil liability, especially the indirect tort liability of the platform provider in the civil liability. It is considered that the indirect tort liability of platform provider should satisfy the requirement that the platform user exists tort, the platform provider should be abetted or aided, and the platform provider must have subjective fault and so on.
【学位授予单位】：西北政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：D922.294
本文编号：2456657
[Abstract]:The diversified needs of people in the Internet era promote the continuous transformation of the traditional trading mode, and the establishment of a new order network trading platform through electronic information technology emerges as the times require. Network trading platform is the summation of information network system which provides transaction matching and related services for two or more parties in e-commerce activities, and its position is very important in the process of network transaction. Facing different kinds of disputes such as the quality of goods, payment of price, terms of contract, distribution of goods and so on, the relevant system of standardizing the order of network transactions is urgently needed to be established in the current online shopping market of our country. A series of legal issues, such as legal status, rights and obligations, liability and other legal issues, have also become a hot topic in the discussion of online trading platform providers as a link between the parties to the transaction. At present, the research on the legal issues of online trading platform providers is still in the groping stage, and the scholars' views are controversial and the conclusions are not uniform. In order to promote the standardization and rationalization of the platform, the author analyzes the tripartite legal relationship among the providers, product (service) providers and consumers according to different platform models, and constructs the tripartite power and responsibility system on this basis. Through the use of many methods, such as case analysis, literature research, comparative analysis, and so on, this paper analyzes six existing theories on the legal status of platform providers in the academic circles, focusing on the center of network trading platform providers. The new intermediary position of platform provider is put forward. It is the first time to distinguish and discuss the legal relationship between platform provider, product (service) provider and consumer in B to C and C to C model. According to the shopping process of platform, the legal relationship between different subjects in each stage is clarified. This paper analyzes the scope of rights and obligations of platform providers, product (service) providers and consumers one by one, focusing on the inspection and care obligations of platform providers. This paper analyzes the legal liability of the platform provider, mainly discusses the liability for breach of contract and tort liability in the civil liability, especially the indirect tort liability of the platform provider in the civil liability. It is considered that the indirect tort liability of platform provider should satisfy the requirement that the platform user exists tort, the platform provider should be abetted or aided, and the platform provider must have subjective fault and so on.
【学位授予单位】：西北政法大学
【学位级别】：硕士
【学位授予年份】：2015
【分类号】：D922.294
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前6条
1 杨立新;韩煦;;网络交易平台提供者的法律地位与民事责任[J];江汉论坛;2014年05期
2 王斯滢;崔青青;;浅析网络团购主体法律关系及其违约责任认定[J];法制博览(中旬刊);2012年12期
3 韩洪今;;网络交易平台提供商的法律定位[J];当代法学;2009年02期
4 吴仙桂;;网络交易平台的法律定位[J];重庆邮电大学学报(社会科学版);2008年06期
5 王迁;;论版权“间接侵权”及其规则的法定化[J];法学;2005年12期
6 刘德良;网络交易中网站的地位与责任问题探讨[J];辽宁大学学报(哲学社会科学版);2004年05期
相关硕士学位论文 前3条
1 张曼;网络团购经营商的法律地位与法律责任研究[D];华中师范大学;2013年
2 岳亭;网络交易平台提供商法律责任研究[D];北方工业大学;2010年
3 余天琦;在线交易平台的法律地位及法律责任研究[D];暨南大学;2005年
，本文编号：2456657
本文链接：https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/jingjifalunwen/2456657.html
