交强险受害人直接请求权制度研究
[Abstract]:Motor vehicle liability compulsory insurance (hereinafter referred to as "compulsory insurance") as a statutory liability insurance, the purpose of its insurance is to protect the interests of motor vehicle traffic accident victims as the center. At present, there are mainly "Road Traffic Safety Law", "Insurance Law", "regulations on forced Traffic Insurance" and "Judicial interpretation of the Supreme people's Court on compensation for Road Traffic damage" in China. As the core, the most direct and the most effective protection of the victim's interests, that is, the direct claim right of the victim of forced risk, but there is no provision, and the definition of the scope of the victim is also controversial in the judicial practice, and so on. The contradictory judgment of different sentences in the same case has increased the difficulty of the victim's claim inconspicuously. At present, the theoretical basis and practical conditions for giving the victim this right have been fully possessed: on the one hand, the analysis of the evolution of the principle of liability imputation of tort law shows that the law of tort liability has gradually increased the protection of the victim. And now the value of liability insurance has been transformed to protect the interests of the victim as the center, so that the victim can get out of the plight of relying on the insured to obtain compensation. In this process, the breakthrough of the principle of relativity of contract also provides theoretical support. On the other hand, insurance has expanded to various fields, has the function of social management, has become a part of people's social life. In addition, the successful experiences of foreign countries and regions can be used for reference, and the insurer's control of defense and settlement in litigation provides realistic conditions for them. Under special circumstances such as on-board personnel, insured persons, policy-holders, drivers and people who have been dumped out of the car, whether they can be converted into victims of insurance compensation should be judged on the basis of the principle of near cause in the insurance law. When the insurer is not liable for compensation, he agrees that article 25 of the Supreme people's Court's Judicial interpretation of compensation for Road Traffic damage regards it as a joint defendant, but it is not in line with the theory of joint litigation in China. The author puts forward that "implicated litigation" should be introduced to perfect it. In exercising the direct claim right of the victim, the victim shall meet certain conditions, such as the compulsory insurance of motor vehicle liability by the obligor of insurance, and the civil tort liability of the insured according to the provisions of tort law. Based on the above analysis, this paper puts forward some suggestions on how to perfect the system of direct claim for compulsory insurance in China: on the one hand, we should fully abide by and implement the value concept of protecting the interests of the victims, and take into account the interests of all parties concerned. On the other hand, it is necessary to perfect the specific system, such as amending the existing relevant legislation and granting the victim the right of direct claim, narrowing the scope of insurance liability and determining the limitation of action for this right.
【学位授予单位】:湘潭大学
【学位级别】:硕士
【学位授予年份】:2017
【分类号】:D922.284
【参考文献】
相关期刊论文 前10条
1 覃山松;;评交强险不分项限额赔偿判决及其社会负面影响[J];福建警察学院学报;2016年02期
2 张家勇;;论合同保护第三人的路径选择[J];法律科学(西北政法大学学报);2016年01期
3 樊启荣;刘玉林;;责任保险目的及功能之百年变迁——兼论我国责任保险法制之未来发展[J];湖南社会科学;2014年06期
4 贾林青;;交强险需要确认交通事故受害人的直接赔偿请求权[J];法律适用;2014年10期
5 李新天;印通;;第三者保险金请求权类型化研究——以《保险法》第65条为中心[J];保险研究;2014年08期
6 李青武;;论责任保险中“第三人”的法律地位[J];学术界;2014年08期
7 张永泉;;必要共同诉讼类型化及其理论基础[J];中国法学;2014年01期
8 杜万华;贺小荣;李明义;姜强;;《关于审理道路交通事故损害赔偿案件适用法律若干问题的解释》的理解与适用[J];法律适用;2013年03期
9 姜强;;交强险的功能定位及其与侵权责任的关系——审理机动车交通事故损害赔偿案件的制度背景[J];法律适用;2013年01期
10 温世扬;;“相对分离原则”下的保险合同与侵权责任[J];当代法学;2012年05期
相关重要报纸文章 前2条
1 赵仁伟 ;刘元旭 ;李江涛;;交强险催生“撞伤不如撞死”?[N];新华每日电讯;2012年
2 邹海林;;交强险的性质和法律适用[N];人民法院报;2006年
相关博士学位论文 前3条
1 余文海;交强险直接请求权法律问题研究[D];武汉大学;2013年
2 解可;机动车强制责任保险法律制度研究[D];吉林大学;2010年
3 马楠;责任保险第三人请求权研究[D];吉林大学;2009年
相关硕士学位论文 前7条
1 刘月竹;机动车强制责任保险中第三人直接请求权的制度研究[D];大连海事大学;2015年
2 郭彩汾;论我国机动车强制责任保险受害人的直接请求权[D];华侨大学;2014年
3 胡群;交通事故损害赔偿案件中保险公司的诉讼地位研究[D];湖南师范大学;2014年
4 石彩霞;交强险中“第三者直接请求权”问题研究[D];上海交通大学;2014年
5 李寒;道路交通事故损害赔偿案件中保险公司的诉讼地位研究[D];中央民族大学;2013年
6 戴冰;机动车强制责任保险的第三人直接请求权研究[D];中国政法大学;2012年
7 喻啸;论机动车强制责任保险中受害人之直接请求权[D];西南政法大学;2007年
,本文编号:2462766
本文链接:https://www.wllwen.com/falvlunwen/jingjifalunwen/2462766.html