权益保护与契约精神:商业秘密保护中的保密协议与竞业禁止协议

发布时间：2019-05-18 15:57

【摘要】：在实务上,为达到企业内部管制的目的,往往将作为被保护之本体的商业秘密与作为一种保护措施的竞业禁止相提并论。此外,也有将保密协议与竞业禁止协议相混淆,无视两者之间的差异,并且将单纯的保密条款也认为具有竞业禁止的性质,并认定其具有合理性的理论学说和实务做法。毋庸置疑,正确理解和适用商业秘密保护中的竞业禁止制度,应当回归于对竞业禁止协议之法律性质的准确认识。有鉴于此,本文就商业秘密、保密协议与竞业禁止之间的区别与连结关系作些探讨,并且在此基础上提出彼此在法律责任承担之性质,以及具体法律适用方面所存在的诸多差异。希望本文能够为厘定理论和认识误区,有所裨益;为解决法律适用和司法实践,提供一定的参考意义。
[Abstract]:In practice, in order to achieve the purpose of enterprise internal control, the trade secret as the protected Noumenon is often compared with the prohibition of competition as a protective measure. In addition, there are some theoretical theories and practical practices that confuse the confidentiality agreement with the non-competition agreement, ignore the differences between the two, and regard the simple confidentiality clause as having the nature of non-competition prohibition, and find it reasonable. There is no doubt that the correct understanding and application of the non-competition prohibition system in the protection of trade secrets should return to an accurate understanding of the legal nature of the non-competition agreement. In view of this, this paper discusses the differences and links between trade secrets, confidentiality agreements and prohibition of non-competition, and on this basis, puts forward the nature of each other's legal liability. And there are many differences in the application of specific laws. It is hoped that this paper can be helpful to determine the theory and misunderstanding, and to provide certain reference significance for solving the application of law and judicial practice.
【作者单位】：最高人民法院中国应用法学研究所;
【基金】：中国博士后科学基金面上资助(资助编号:2016M600173)
【分类号】：D922.294

【相似文献】