信托受托人亲自管理义务的规范模式——比较与选择

发布时间：2019-06-28 14:32

【摘要】：比较法上存在两种具有代表性的亲自管理义务规范模式。美国的谨慎义务规范模式赋予受托人决定是否委托第三人处理信托事务的广泛的自由裁量权,并对受托人违反亲自管理义务适用过错责任,对受托人委托第三人处理信托事务持鼓励态度。日本的委托权规范模式仅赋予受托人委托第三人处理信托事务的有限的自由裁量权,并对受托人违反亲自管理义务适用严格责任,对受托人委托第三人处理信托事务持限制态度。谨慎义务规范模式体现了受益人最大利益原则,并且与受托人的亲自管理义务的本质相契合。我国信托法对受托人委托第三人处理信托事务仍然持严格限制的立场,显然不合时宜,在未来的改革中可以借鉴美国的谨慎义务规范模式重构受托人亲自管理义务的规则。
[Abstract]:There are two representative norms of personal management obligations in comparative law. The standard mode of duty of care in the United States gives trustees a wide range of discretion to decide whether to entrust a third party to handle trust affairs, and applies fault liability to trustees in violation of their personal management obligations, and encourages trustees to entrust third parties to handle trust affairs. The normative mode of entrustment power in Japan only gives trustees limited discretion to entrust a third party to handle trust affairs, and applies strict liability to trustees in violation of their personal management obligations, and holds a restricted attitude towards trustees entrusting a third party to handle trust affairs. The normative model of duty of care embodies the principle of the best interests of the beneficiary and coincides with the essence of the personal management obligation of the trustee. The trust law of our country still holds the strict restriction position that the trustee entrusts the third party to handle the trust affairs, which is obviously out of date. In the future reform, we can draw lessons from the prudent obligation norm mode of the United States to reconstruct the rules of the trustee's personal management obligation.
【作者单位】：贵州民族大学法学院;
【基金】：贵州民族大学引进人才科研基金资助项目“第三方支付服务的信托法规制研究”(15XRY001)
【分类号】：D922.282

【相似文献】