汉英立法文本的句法特征及其文化阐释

发布时间：2021-11-05 15:14

　　近年来有关法律语言的特征分析、法律语言风格特征、法律语言与翻译原则等研究方面出现了一些论文或论著,但关于英汉法律语言的句法对比研究方面尚有很大研究的空间。为此,本文试图通过分析英汉立法语言的语体和句法特征,从传统文化的角度论述了产生这些句法差异的原因,以期对法律语言的深入研究奠定一定基础。论文除引言和结语外,共由四章组成。第一章简要分析了立法语言的主要特征。作者结合法律的特征,即规范性、权威性和抽象性,分析了相应的立法语言特征,即精确性、晦涩性和机械性。第二章主要介绍汉英立法文本的句法特征。文章从句法的定义及其研究对象出发,探讨了汉英立法文本在综合语与分析语、形合与意合、语序、句子信息结构安排、主语突显与话题突显及主动语态与被动语态等六个方面的句法差异。汉语以分析语为主要特征,主要靠意合手段组合句子;它以意念为主轴,话题突显,多用人称主语和主动语态。此外,汉语的词序安排主要以时、空发展及心理上的轻重为序,重隐性连贯;句子信息中心一般后置,呈句首开放、句尾封闭型分布。而英语则属于分析-综合语,主要靠形合手段组合句子。它以主谓提挈为主轴,主语突显,常用物称主语和被动语态。词序安排上重逻辑推... 

【文章来源】：西南政法大学重庆市

【文章页数】：58 页

【学位级别】：硕士

【文章目录】：
Acknowledgement
Abstract(English)
Abstract(Chinese)
Introduction
Chapter One General Features of the Legislative Language
    1.1.Normativityand Accuracy
    1.2.Authoritativeness and Obscurity
    1.3.Abstractness and Dullness
Chapter Two A Contrastive Study of the Syntactic Characteristics of English and Chinese Legislative Texts
    2.1.Definition of Syntax
    2.2.Contrastive Study of Syntax in English and Chinese Legislative Texts
        2.2.1.Synthesis vs.Analysis
        2.2.2.Hypothesis vs.Parataxis
        2.2.3.Word Order
            2.2.3.1.Word Order in the Chinese Legislative Language
            2.2.3.2.Word Order in the English Legislative Language
        2.2.4 The Arrangement of Information Focus
        2.2.5.Subject Prominence vs.Topic Prominence
            2.2.5.1.Subject Prominence in English
            2.2.5.2.Topic Prominence in Chinese
        2.2.6.Passive Voice vs.Active Voice
            2.2.6.1.The Prominence of Passive Voice in the English Legislative Texts
            2.2.6.2.The Prominence of Active Voice in the Chinese Legislative Texts
Chapter Three The Special Sentence Patterns in Chinese and English Legislative Texts
    3.1.Special Sentence Patterns in the Chinese Legislative Texts
        3.1.1.The "de(的)" Structure
        3.1.2.The "dan/danshi(但是but)" Structure
        3.1.3.The "dui/duiyu(对/对于)" Structure
        3.1.4.The "shi(是copula)" Structure
        3.1.5.The Parallel Structure
            3.1.5.1.The "huozhe(或者or)" Structure
            3.1.5.2.The "yixia(以下following)" Structure
    3.2.Special Sentence Patterns in English Legislative Texts
        3.2.1.The "Otherwise" Structure
        3.2.2 The Adverbial of Condition with "where"
        3.2.3.The "Any person who...shall...." Structure
        3.2.4.The "Subject to"Structure
        3.2.5 The "Provided that" Structure e
        3.2.6.The "Notwithstanding" Structure
        3.2.7.The "For the purpose(s) of..." Structure
        3.2.8.The "With respect to..." Structure
Chapter Four The Cultural Interpretation of Syntactic Differences in English and Chinese Legislative Texts
    4.1.Language and Culture
        4.1.1.The Definitions of Culture and Language
        4.1.2.The Relationship between Language and Culture
    4.2.Differences between the Chinese Culture and the British Culture
        4.2.1.Differences in Geographic and Economic Bases
        4.2.2.Difference in Political Structures
        4.2.3.Differences in the Essence of the English Culture and the Chinese Culture
            4.2.3.1."Unification" vs."Separation"
            4.2.3.2.Human Standard vs.God Standard
            4.2.3.3.Peace vs.Antagonism
    4.3.The Chinese Culture and the Chinese Syntactic Structures
        4.3.1.The Geographic and Economic Bases and the Chinese Syntax
        4.3.2."Human Standard" and "Unification" and the Chinese Syntax
        4.3.3.The traditional Chinese Institutional Culture and Word Order in the Chinese Language
    4.4.The English Culture and the English Syntactic Structure
        4.4.1.The British Geographic and Economic Bases and the English Syntax
        4.4.2.The British Economic and Political Structure and the English Syntax
        4.4.3."God Standard" and the English Syntax
Conclusion
Bibliography


【参考文献】：
期刊论文
[1]试论法律英语的词法和句法特点[J]. 穆可娟.  福建外语. 2001(01)
[2]法律英语语句结构探析[J]. 唐震熙.  北京第二外国语学院学报. 2000(06)



本文编号：3478040