证据的界说—以字典释义为中心的历史语义学分析

发布时间：2017-12-26 20:38

本文关键词：证据的界说—以字典释义为中心的历史语义学分析　出处：《证据科学》2014年04期 　论文类型：期刊论文

【摘要】：通过把"证据"界定为一个语词,追溯"证据"一词在中西普通辞典中的释义历史,分析得出证据语词在中西语言中兼有动词与名词的双重属性,各以语族而非单一语词形式出现。中文强调了指称行为(证明活动),而西文更注重指称性质(明显性)。迄至当代,中西证据语词在指称外在可见的事物上基本达成一致。由之分析证据释义形式,可知因语词定义与真实定义的区别,证据的情境性、释义历史性等特点,证据只有在证据活动中才能被认识,从而证据定义问题在很大程度上被转化为一个证据(符号)如何使用(指称与表达)的问题,人对证据概念的认知程度将限定着证据概念的呈现程度。
[Abstract]:By defining "evidence" as a word and tracing the definition history of "evidence" in Chinese and Western common dictionaries, it is concluded that there are two attributes in Chinese and Western languages, including verbs and nouns, which appear in the form of language rather than single word. In Chinese, the referential behavior (proof of activity) is emphasized, while the western language pays more attention to the referential nature (distinctness). Up to the present, and evidence of words in the reference external visible things on the basic agreement. By the analysis of evidence form, that due to the difference between the nominal definition and the real definition, characteristics of evidence situation, historical interpretation, evidence can only be recognized in the evidence, and evidence to define the problem to a great extent be transformed into a proof (symbol) how to use (reference and expression). The problem, people awareness of the concept of evidence will limit the present degree of evidence concept.
【作者单位】：复旦大学;
【分类号】：D915.13
【正文快照】： *余伟,复旦大学助理研究员。·402·“证据”一词在日常生活与学术研究中被频繁使用,证据概念也是学术研究的焦点之一。西方学界围绕证据问题进行了诸多讨论,国内研究多集中在法学领域,基本上侧重把证据与外在物体、客观事实、因果逻辑链联系在一起来讨论。证据常常被定义为事

【参考文献】